Responsible Center: NASA JSC
Grant Monitor:
Center Contact:
Unique ID: 6631
|
Solicitation / Funding Source: Directed Research
Grant/Contract No.: NNX07AI90A
Project Type: GROUND
Flight Program:
TechPort: No |
No. of Post Docs: 1
No. of PhD Candidates: 1
No. of Master's Candidates:
No. of Bachelor's Candidates: 16
|
No. of PhD Degrees: 1
No. of Master's Degrees:
No. of Bachelor's Degrees:
|
|
Human Research Program Elements: |
(1) HHC:Human Health Countermeasures
|
|
Human Research Program Risks: |
(1) EVA:Risk of Injury and Compromised Performance Due to EVA Operations
|
|
Human Research Program Gaps: |
(1) EVA-101:Determine limitations of EVA performance and physiological metrics shortly post-landing on a planetary surface (with compromised physiology based on flight duration).
|
|
Flight Assignment/Project Notes: |
NOTE: Received NCE to 12/31/2008 (from 12/31/2007) per PI (3/08)
NOTE: Received NCE to 3/31/2008 per PI (12/07) |
|
Task Description: |
This research evaluated the physiological functioning and subjective comfort of subjects while donned in each of five liquid cooling garments. The goal was to identify the optimal features of each of the garments to maintain core temperature and comfort under intensive physical exertion. Four males and 2 females between the ages of 22 and 46 participated in this study. The garments evaluated were the Minnesota Advanced Cooling Suit (MACS-Delphi), Russian Orlan, NASA LCVG, MACS-Delphi without hood, and Russian Orlan without hood. Subjects were tested on different days in 2 different environmental chamber temperature/humidity conditions (24oC/H-28%; 35oC/H-20%). Each session consisted of stages of treadmill walking/running (250W to 700W at different stages) and rest. Skin and core temperatures, energy expenditure, heart rate, evaporative/nonevaporative sweat rate, and ratings of thermal comfort and heat sensation, overall and on specific body areas were measured throughout each session. There were significant differences among garments in femoralis temperature (p<0.001), and calf temperature (p<0.05); the LCVG was lowest in temperature on these areas. In general, the findings showed few consistent differences among the garments. The MACS-Delphi was better able to maintain subjects within a skin and core temperature comfort zone than was evident in the other garments as indicated by a lesser fluctuation in temperatures across physical exertion levels. The LCVG provided the greatest amount of cooling, in some conditions this resulted in body overcooling as noted in declines in skin temperature below a comfort level. Subjective ratings of thermal comfort were higher in the MACS-Delphi. Physiological findings comparing garments with and without the hood were inconclusive; however, subjects rated both the MACS-Delphi and the Orlan with hood as higher in overall thermal comfort. |
|
Research Impact/Earth Benefits: |
The findings of this research have application for optimal designs of cooling garments for firefighters, those donned in HAZMAT suits, and for military personnel active in extremely hot or cold environmental conditions. |