Task Progress:
|
Ed. Note - September 2024:
Dr. Clement will be retiring from NASA. For additional information on this investigation, see:
1) Prior Reporting: "Neuro-Vestibular Examination During and After Spaceflight (Vestibular Health) (PI: Reschke)": https://taskbook.nasaprs.com/tbp/index.cfm?action=public_query_taskbook_content&TASKID=14669 . From 2019-2022, the Principal Investigator was Millard Reschke, Ph.D.
2) Current Reporting: "Neuro-Vestibular Examination During and After Spaceflight (Vestibular Health) (PI: Macaulay)": https://taskbook.nasaprs.com/tbp/index.cfm?action=public_query_taskbook_content&TASKID=17329 . Beginning in 2024, the Principal Investigator will be Timothy Macaulay, Ph.D.
---------------------------------------
This past reporting period, the Neuro-Vestibular Examination During and After Spaceflight (Vestibular Health) study continued collecting data as part of the Complement of Integrated Protocols for Human Exploration (CIPHER). [Ed. Note: CIPHER is the short title for a set of 14 studies sponsored by NASA and international partner agencies ( https://www.nasa.gov/feature/experiments-to-unlock-how-human-bodies-react-to-long-space-journeys ). The first six inflight data collections and the first eight postflight data collections were completed. These major milestones were accomplished despite the challenges of spaceflight operations. For example, on the day of return (R+0), the teams successfully navigated last-minute changes to the landing schedules/locations and used contingency protocols to collect data (average ~8 hours after landing) amid re-entry motion sickness symptoms. To date, two crewmembers have completed all preflight, inflight, and postflight testing, one crewmember is currently undergoing inflight testing, and two crewmembers are currently undergoing preflight testing. The latest Informed Crew Briefings (ICB) were presented to Crew-10 and 73S. Several inflight operator training sessions have also been completed to prepare the crew to help collect these data inflight. The inflight and post-flight motion sickness questionnaires were further customized to support collaboration across related studies.
During the latest inflight exam, additional noise was noted in the eye tracking data collected via the commercial binocular video eye tracker on the International Space Station. Our team has worked with the manufacturer to troubleshoot and replicate this issue on the ground. Crew time is being scheduled to conduct a hardware diagnostic test for further inflight troubleshooting. Postprocessing workarounds have been developed to reduce the impact of this noise; thus, the issue will not hinder the collection of these important data.
A ground-based study was conducted to compare the balance control and cognitive responses of subjects with bilateral vestibulopathy (BVP) to those of astronauts immediately after they return from long-duration spaceflight aboard the International Space Station. The astronaut data came from a previous study. Thirty subjects with BVP performed five tests using the same procedures as twenty-eight astronauts: sit-to-stand, walk-and-turn, tandem walk, duration judgment, and reaction time. Compared to the astronauts' preflight responses, the BVP subjects' responses were impaired in all five tests. However, the BVP subjects' performance during the walk-and-turn and the tandem walk tests were comparable to the astronauts' performance on the day they returned from space. Moreover, the BVP subjects' time perception and reaction time were comparable to those of the astronauts during spaceflight. The BVP subjects performed the sit-to-stand test at a level that fell between the astronauts' performance on the day of landing and 1 day later. These results indicate that the alterations in dynamic balance control, time perception, and reaction time that astronauts experience after spaceflight are likely driven by central vestibular adaptations. Vestibular and somatosensory training in orbit and vestibular rehabilitation after spaceflight could be effective countermeasures for mitigating these post-flight performance decrements. The results of this study were published in a peer-reviewed article.
Another ground-based study was conducted to examine variations of the video head impulse test (vHIT), which is conducted as part of the inflight protocol to examine changes in the horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex in response to high-velocity head movements to detect changes in peripheral vestibular function. Correct interpretation of the flight study data will require consideration of potential artifacts and the constraints of conducting this test across different phases of the mission. Therefore, the aims of our ground study were to (1) examine reliability across different test operators, and (2) compare the results of active (aHIT) versus passive (pHIT) approaches to evaluate the feasibility of self-administered versus operator-assisted approaches. A comparison of responses with visual viewing of a wall target (default condition) versus vision occluded evaluated the influence of other oculomotor control influence across conditions, and a comparison with computer-generated rotator head impulse tests (rHIT) examined the variability associated with the ocular responses independent of the variability in executing the head movements themselves. Seventeen non-astronaut volunteers (male n=12, age=22.9 ± 3.0; female n=5, age=27.0 ± 6.0, mean ± std) completed HIT testing using video-oculography (VOG) goggles and a high-torque rotator system. The test order was counterbalanced across conditions: (1) passive head-on-torso (pHIT, default condition for flight study) using two operators, (2) active head-on-torso (aHIT, subject initiated), and (3) passive head and torso using rotary chair (rHIT). Eye and head movement data were processed to obtain gain in each direction. While the pHIT gains were similar with vision and vision occluded conditions, the percentage of acceptable trials was greater with vision (~93%) versus occluded (~69%). The reliability between operators was acceptable for pHIT gain (Intraclass Correlation, ICC = 0.66, p = 0.001). The percentage of acceptable trials reduced by ~20% during the self-administered aHITs for both visual conditions and tended to be lower than computer-generated rHITs (76% versus 83%). While the aHIT gains were not significantly different than pHIT gains for vision or vision occluded conditions, these measures were poorly correlated. Our findings support the feasibility of using the standard pHIT methodology for spaceflight. Similarities between visual conditions reflect that these responses are mediated by the peripheral lateral canals rather than other oculomotor mechanisms. The inter-tester reliability was acceptable despite differences in the tester training. In addition to concerns about non-vestibular mechanisms introduced during self-administered aHITs, operator-assisted pHITs resulted in a higher percentage of acceptable trials and should result in more efficient and reliable measures during spaceflight. The results of this ground study were presented at the NASA Human Research Program Investigators’ Workshops in 2024 and the Aerospace Medical Association Annual Scientific Meeting in 2024.
|
|
Abstracts for Journals and Proceedings
|
Carey M, Ehrenburg M, Macaulay T, Wood S. "Comparison of active and passive head impulse testing of the horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex: exploring the feasibility of different approaches for spaceflight." Aerospace Medical Association Annual Scientific Meeting, Chicago, Illinois, May 5-9, 2024. Abstracts. Aerospace Medical Association Annual Scientific Meeting, Chicago, Illinois, May 5-9, 2024. , May-2024
|
|
Abstracts for Journals and Proceedings
|
Macaulay T, Wood S, Reschke M, De Dios Y, Dervay J, Makishima T, Schubert M, Shelhamer M, Kheradmand A, Clement G "Neuro-vestibular examination during and following spaceflight (vestibular health)." 2024 NASA Human Research Program Investigators’ Workshop, Galveston, Texas, February 13-16, 2024. Abstracts. 2024 NASA Human Research Program Investigators’ Workshop, Galveston, Texas, February 13-16, 2024. , Feb-2024
|
|
Abstracts for Journals and Proceedings
|
Carey M, Ehrenburg M, Macaulay T, Wood S. "Comparison of active and passive head impulse testing of the horizontal vestibulo-ocular reflex: Exploring the feasibility of different approaches for spaceflight." 2024 NASA Human Research Program Investigators’ Workshop, Galveston, Texas, February 13-16, 2024. Abstracts. 2024 NASA Human Research Program Investigators’ Workshop, Galveston, Texas, February 13-16, 2024. , Feb-2024
|
|
Articles in Peer-reviewed Journals
|
Clément G, Moudy SC, Macaulay TR, Bishop MO, Wood SJ. "Mission-critical tasks for assessing risks from vestibular and sensorimotor adaptation during space exploration." Front Physiol. 2022 Nov 25;13:1029161. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.1029161 ; PubMed PMID: 36505047; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9733831 , Nov-2022
|
|
Articles in Peer-reviewed Journals
|
Clément G, Kuldavletova O, Macaulay TR, Wood SJ, Navarro Morales DC, Toupet M, Hautefort C, Van Nechel C, Quarck G, Denise P. "Cognitive and balance functions of astronauts after spaceflight are comparable to those of individuals with bilateral vestibulopathy." Front Neurol. 2023 Oct 27;14:1284029. 10.3389/fneur.2023.1284029 ; PubMed PMID: 37965165; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC10641777 , Nov-2023
|
|