Task Progress:
|
1. Original Project Aims
Aim 1. Define GCR effects on translationally-relevant cognitive tests in mice.
Aim 2. Define the outcomes of GCR on adaptive, social-stress-mediated behavior.
2. Key Findings
To accomplish aim 1, we have exposed 6-month-old male and female mice to an acute, whole-body 750mGy dose of the NSRL’s 33-GCR. To assess CDDO-EA as a GCR countermeasure, we gave a subset in mice receiving either Sham or GCR ad libitum access to a CDDO-EA-containing diet (400mg/kg); whereas, non-countermeasure mice received a vehicle (Veh) diet of the same excipient preparation omitting CDDO-EA.
Four months after radiation, male mice were tested for locomotor activity with activity chambers, anxiety with open field (OF) and elevated-plus mazes (EPM), sociability and social memory with the 3 chamber social interaction (3-CSI) test and object memory, with the novel object recognition (NOR) test. We observed no effects of diet on weights among the four groups of male mice for the duration of the experiment. We similarly did not observe significant differences in mouse survival between groups. Following suit, behavioral analyses revealed no major differences in gross locomotion, anxiety, or object memory following radiation. However, in 3-CSI CDDO-EA/33-GCR, mice failed to spend more time exploring a stranger mouse vs. nothing, suggesting sociability deficits, and Veh/33-GCR and CDDO-EA/Sham mice failed to discriminate between a stranger vs. familiar mouse, suggesting social memory deficits. CDDO-EA did not attenuate the 33-GCR-induced social memory deficits. Our findings suggest that radiation poses a risk to socio-cognitive behavior, and that CDDO-EA was not an effective GCR countermeasure in male mice. Future elucidation of the mechanisms underlying 33-GCR-induced social memory deficits will improve risk analysis for astronauts which may, in turn, improve countermeasures.
Female mice similarly maintained similar weights among groups for the duration of the experiment. They were next trained for a touchscreen-based appetitive behavioral platform (ABET II, Lafayette Neuroscience) for one month. Mice were next tested for visuo-spatial pattern separation, by the Location Discrimination task. For both the “easy” and “hard” separation settings, Veh/33-GCR completed fewer daily trials throughout the three month-long testing period. Mice were next tested for a rule-based acquisition test, and subsequently for extinction learning. Veh/33-GCR took nearly three times longer to reach acquisition criteria than the other groups. However, we observed no differences among groups in extinction learning. Touchscreen testing was followed by arena testing for anxiety (EPM, OF), sociability and social memory (3-CSI), object memory (NOR), and compulsive-like behavior (marble-burying and nestlet-digging). We observed no differences in social, cognitive, or compulsive behavior; however, Veh/33-GCR and CDDO-EA/33-GCR mice explored the center of the OF for shorter durations than non-33-GCR mice. Overall, 33-GCR exposure resulted in pattern separation and rule-based acquisition deficits in mice, which was prevented by CDDO-EA. 33-GCR also caused lowered open field exploration, which was not prevented by CDDO-EA.
To fulfill aim 2, we exposed six-month-old male and female mice to 3 x 6.7 cGy of 56Fe (600MeV/n) every other day for five days. Six months after exposure, mice were tested for social hierarchy and dominance behavior via the tube dominance test across 16 days. Next, mice were tested for anxious behavior (OF), sociability and social memory (3-CSI), and despair response with the Forced Swim Test. We observed sex-specific responses to social hierarchy and dominance behavior. Radiation lowered rank attainment, and lowered rank stability in males, but improved these measures in females. Rank and other behavioral and histological analyses are ongoing.
3. Impact of Key Findings on Hypotheses
Guided by a literature of simple GCR models, it was hypothesized that a complex ground-based GCR simulation would result in numerous behavioral deficits in male and female mice of astronaut-equivalent age. Overall, we did not observe the commonly reported behavioral deficits described in the literature, such as anxious behavior and object memory. However, male mice nevertheless displayed social memory deficits, and female mice displayed lowered pattern separation, rule-based acquisition, and increased anxious behavior, suggesting our hypothesis that radiation would result in behavioral deficits is accepted.
Contrary to our hypotheses, CDDO-EA was an ineffective countermeasure for radiation-induced social memory deficits in male mice, and when given in combination with 33-GCR, appeared to induce sociability deficits. However, in female mice, CDDO-EA prevented radiation-induced deficits to cognitive behaviors (pattern separation and rule-based acquisition). CDDO-EA did not, however, prevent 33-GCR-induced OF anxiety in females, suggesting partial success as a radiation countermeasure in female, but not male mice.
4. Proposed Research Plan for the Coming Year
Early analyses of tube test data indicate sex-specific responses to hierarchy and stress-mediated social conflict resolution. To understand what might give rise to these differences, we will extrapolate individual mouse behaviors across the testing period using deep learning-based automated ethograms to quantify within-tube behaviors such as conflict lengths, methods of resolution (passive vs. conflict-based), number of pushes, retreats, etc. To investigate the brain regions involved in tube-based conflicts we will process collected brain tissues from behaviorally naive, but acutely tube-tested mice. Tissues will be stained for immediate early genes for insight into the neuronal ensembles involved in this task, and quantified to understand if there are radiation differences in the regions involved in tube testing between sham and irradiated mice, and whether these vary by sex, or social rank.
|