Menu

 

The NASA Task Book
Advanced Search     

Project Title:  Characterization of Psychological Risk, Overlap with Physical Health, and Associated Performance in Isolated, Confined, Extreme (ICE) Environments Reduce
Images: icon  Fiscal Year: FY 2023 
Division: Human Research 
Research Discipline/Element:
HRP HFBP:Human Factors & Behavioral Performance (IRP Rev H)
Start Date: 11/13/2014  
End Date: 09/30/2022  
Task Last Updated: 11/25/2022 
Download report in PDF pdf
Principal Investigator/Affiliation:   Alfano, Candice  Ph.D. / University of Houston 
Address:  Psychology Department 
126 Heyne Bldg 
Houston , TX 77204-5022 
Email: caalfano@uh.edu 
Phone: 713-743-8611  
Congressional District: 18 
Web:  
Organization Type: UNIVERSITY 
Organization Name: University of Houston 
Joint Agency:  
Comments:  
Co-Investigator(s)
Affiliation: 
Connaboy, Christopher  Ph.D. University of Pittsburgh 
Simpson, Richard  Ph.D. University of Houston 
Gallagher, Matthew  Ph.D. University of Houston 
Key Personnel Changes / Previous PI: July 2021 report: Dr. Matthew Gallagher was added as a Co-Investigator-statistician during the NCE starting in April 2020; Dr. Mitzi Laughlin is no longer CoI on the project.
Project Information: Grant/Contract No. NNX15AC13G 
Responsible Center: NASA JSC 
Grant Monitor: Whitmire, Alexandra  
Center Contact:  
alexandra.m.whitmire@nasa.gov 
Unique ID: 10168 
Solicitation / Funding Source: 2013-14 HERO NNJ13ZSA002N-BMED Behavioral Health & Performance 
Grant/Contract No.: NNX15AC13G 
Project Type: GROUND 
Flight Program:  
TechPort: No 
No. of Post Docs:
No. of PhD Candidates:
No. of Master's Candidates:
No. of Bachelor's Candidates:
No. of PhD Degrees:
No. of Master's Degrees:
No. of Bachelor's Degrees:
Human Research Program Elements: (1) HFBP:Human Factors & Behavioral Performance (IRP Rev H)
Human Research Program Risks: (1) BMed:Risk of Adverse Cognitive or Behavioral Conditions and Psychiatric Disorders
Human Research Program Gaps: (1) BMed-101:We need to identify, quantify, and validate the key selection factors for astronaut cognitive and behavioral strengths (e.g., resiliency) and operationally-relevant performance threats for increasingly Earth independent, long-duration, autonomous, and/or long-distance exploration missions.
(2) BMed-102:Given exposures to spaceflight hazards (space radiation, isolation), how do we identify individual susceptibility, monitor molecular/biomarkers and acceptable thresholds, and validate behavioral health and CNS/neurological/neuropsychological performance measures and domains of relevance to exploration class missions?
(3) BMed-103:What are the validated, efficacious treatments (individual or Team-based) and/or countermeasures to prevent adverse behavioral conditions, CNS/neurological, and/or psychiatric disorders caused by either single and/or integrated exposures to spaceflight hazards during exploration class missions?
(4) BMed-108:Given each crewmember will experience multiple spaceflight hazards simultaneously, we need to identify and characterize the potential additive, antagonistic, or synergistic impacts of multiple stressors (e.g., space radiation, altered gravity, isolation, altered immune, altered sleep) on crew health and/or CNS/ cognitive functioning to develop threshold limits and validate countermeasures for any identified adverse crew health and/or operationally-relevant performance outcomes.
Flight Assignment/Project Notes: NOTE: End date changed to 9/30/2022 per NSSC information (Ed., 8/24/21)

NOTE: End date changed to 9/30/2021 per NSSC information (Ed., 4/22/2020)

NOTE: End date changed to 3/31/2020 per NSSC information (Ed., 1/29/2020)

NOTE: End date changed to 12/31/2019 per NSSC information (Ed., 7/17/19)

NOTE: End date changed to 5/31/2019 per NSSC information (Ed., 2/12/19)

NOTE: End date changed to 1/31/2019 per NSSC information (Ed., 12/28/18)

NOTE: End date changed to 11/12/2018 per NSSC information (Ed., 12/13/17)

NOTE: Element change to Human Factors & Behavioral Performance; previously Behavioral Health & Performance (Ed., 1/17/17)

Task Description: Anecdotal and empirical findings collected in space and other extreme environments continue to highlight the potential for psychological symptoms and conditions to degrade crew performance, increase conflict, and jeopardize mission success. Indeed, ‘negative reactions’ during periods of isolation, confinement, demanding work schedules, stimulus reduction, separation from loved ones, sleep deprivation, and a host of other stressors are more appropriately viewed as normative rather than pathogenic. Selection methods and countermeasures serve to mitigate some degree of psychological risk, but long-duration space flight will substantially extend exposure to these and other stressors. Previous research documenting psychological symptoms experienced during space flight and in other isolated and confined environments (ICE) provides evidence of a wide range of psychological and behavioral reactions.

Unfortunately however, these collective data ultimately serve to raise more questions than answers. Differences in collection methods, types of symptoms/reactions assessed, psychological constructs examined, and timing and duration of measurements limit conclusions that can be drawn from this research. As a result, understanding of the discrete symptoms and conditions most likely to occur during space flight and thus, ability to quantify the magnitude, probability, or consequences of such risk remains inadequate. The current project proposes to address these notable gaps in knowledge via three specific Aims. First, we will conduct extensive scientific literature reviews and interviews with subject matter experts in order to synthesize existing knowledge of the psychological and behavioral symptoms experienced in space and other extreme environments (Aim 1). Our review will directly inform the development of a comprehensive checklist of symptoms to be monitored among 6 separate cohorts (i.e., 2 Antarctic and 4 Human Exploration Research Analog (HERA) cohorts)) as part of a longitudinal investigation (Aim 2). Symptoms will be examined based on their point/period prevalence, severity, and duration. The checklist will also be administered (repeatedly) in conjunction with a physical symptoms checklist in order to examine concurrent and sequential overlap between psychological and physical health symptoms as means of clarifying potential etiologies. Finally, our study will extend previous research by exploring relationships among psychological health, sleep loss/dysregulation, biomarkers of stress, and performance-based outcomes (Aim 3). A comprehensive battery of cognitive and performance measures (including a perception-action coupling task) will be administered repeatedly as part of our longitudinal study. These outcomes will inform a final list of psychological/ behavioral symptoms to be examined during an extended International Space Station (ISS) mission.

Research Impact/Earth Benefits: Anecdotal and empirical findings collected in space and other extreme environments continue to highlight the potential for psychological symptoms and conditions to degrade crew performance, increase conflict, and jeopardize mission success. Indeed, ‘negative reactions’ during periods of isolation, confinement, demanding work schedules, stimulus reduction, separation from loved ones, sleep deprivation, and a host of other stressors are more appropriately viewed as normative rather than pathogenic. Selection methods and countermeasures serve to mitigate some degree of psychological risk, but long-duration space flight will substantially extend exposure to these and other stressors. Previous research documenting psychological symptoms experienced during space flight and in other isolated and confined environments (ICE) provides evidence of a wide range of psychological and behavioral reactions. Unfortunately however, these collective data ultimately serve to raise more questions than answers. Differences in collection methods, types of symptoms/reactions assessed, psychological constructs examined, and timing and duration of measurements limit conclusions that can be drawn from this research. As a result, understanding of the discrete symptoms and conditions most likely to occur during space flight and thus, ability to quantify the magnitude, probability, or consequences of such risk remains inadequate. Thus, there is a need to: (1) identify the psychological/behavioral symptoms that pose the greatest threat to performance; (2) provide accurate and acceptable risk thresholds; (3) inform screening and selection processes; (4) guide further development of suitable working practices (standard operating procedures); and (5) develop interventions and counter measures to mitigate these risks.

This project specifically addresses several knowledge gaps related to Risks of Adverse Behavioral Conditions and Psychiatric Disorders [Ed. note: August 2021--Gaps have changed since this grant was awarded in FY2015; see Human Research Roadmap https://humanresearchroadmap.nasa.gov/ ] including: Gap 1 (Need to identify and quantify the key threats to and promoters of mission relevant behavioral health and performance during exploration class missions) and Gap 3 (Need to identify and validate measures to monitor behavioral health and performance and determine acceptable thresholds for these measures during exploration missions). Our primary goal is to identify the psychological and behavioral health symptoms with the greatest likelihood of occurrence during extended human space flight/habitation to space and to estimate associated levels of threat imposed to mission-based performance. As a final deliverable, a checklist of symptoms will be developed for implementation during an ISS mission (>6 months) in order to determine its feasibility, reliability, and facilitation of evidence-based decision making with regard to crew health, safety, and mission success.

As a first step, we will conduct extensive scientific literature reviews and interviews with subject matter experts in order to synthesize existing knowledge of the psychological and behavioral symptoms experienced in space and other extreme environments (Aim 1). Our review will directly inform the development of a comprehensive checklist of symptoms to be monitored in two longitudinal studies including one HERA campaign and cohorts at the McMurdo and South Pole Antarctic stations (Aim 2). The checklist will also be administered (repeatedly) in conjunction with a list of physical complaints in order to examine concurrent and sequential overlap between psychological and physical health symptoms. Finally, our study will extend previous research by exploring relationships among psychological health, sleep dysregulation, biomarkers of stress, and performance-based cognitive outcomes (Aim 3). A comprehensive battery of cognitive and performance measures will be administered in conjunction with our other measures as part of our longitudinal study. Outcomes will inform a final mental health checklist for use during long duration space flight. As a supplemental Aim, we will examine the reliability of our mental health checklist in two Antarctic cohorts at the Palmer station.

Task Progress & Bibliography Information FY2023 
Task Progress: All project Aims have been met. We developed a 23-item self-report Mental Health Checklist (MHCL) to assess psychological health in isolated confined extreme (ICE) settings. The MHCL includes three reliable subscales—positive adaptation, poor self-regulation, and anxious apprehension—each assessing unique aspects of psychological health. In a 9-month longitudinal study, we assessed 110 personnel stationed at either McMurdo (coastal station) or South Pole (inland station). At the South Pole station, a total of 22 participants were enrolled and 88 participants were enrolled at the McMurdo station. Because crew at McMurdo are not required to be on station for the entire winter season, there was variability in the number of monthly sessions completed at this station. Antarctic participants were predominantly White (94.5%, n = 104) males (80%, n = 88) between the ages of 22 and 70 years old (M = 37.63, SD = 11.95). Because the greatest number of McMurdo participants completed 6 months of assessments, this time point was used to compare monthly outcomes across the two stations. For all participants, MHCL positive adaptation scores decreased significantly and MHCL poor self-regulation scores increased significantly from baseline to the end of study. Overall change in MHCL anxious apprehension scores across mission were non-significant, though month-to-month variability was observed. Higher poor self-regulation scores were observed at McMurdo compared to the South Pole during the early months of the mission. Anxious apprehension scores were significantly higher at the McMurdo station than at South Pole during all months.

Prevalence and severity of physical symptoms increased significantly from baseline to the end of study in the full Antarctic sample but there were no significant differences in physical symptoms between the two stations. Changes in biomarkers of stress (cortisol, DHEA, or the cortisol:DHEA ratios) were not observed from baseline to the end of the mission. However, cortisol and cortisol:DHEA ratios were significantly higher among McMurdo compared to South Pole participants. Cognitive performance was also examined monthly using the Psychomotor Vigilance Test (PVT), the Spaceflight Cognitive Assessment Tool for Windows (WinSCAT), and the Perception-Action Coupling Task (PACT). Performance on the WinSCAT improved during early mission months and was sustained through the end of the study. PACT performance decreased across mission, but no changes were observed in PVT scores.

Several study participants underwent emergency evacuation from the McMurdo station during the study. We examined monthly reports, biomarkers, and cognitive performance among 4 evacuees compared to the remaining McMurdo sample (n = 84) to identify potential indicators of distress prior to evacuation. Emergency evacuation occurred for medical reasons (n = 2) or for psychiatric reasons (n = 2). Elevated MHCL anxious apprehension scores were most common among all evacuees. Elevated physical symptoms were also apparent in one psychiatric and one medical evacuee in the months prior to evacuation. We did not find any biomarker of stress or objective sleep regularity to differ among evacuees compared to the full sample.

At the Palmer station, the MHCL measure was administered to 26 participants during two winter-over seasons. MHCL data were collected for 4 consecutive months. The Palmer station is similar to the McMurdo station in climate and its coastal location, but similar to the South Pole in terms of size/number of residents. Similar to Antarctic participants at the McMurdo and South Pole stations, positive adaptation scores declined across mission whereas changes in poor self-regulation were more modest. The greatest increases in anxious apprehension scores were observed in later mission months.

Collective findings indicate the MHCL is a reliable and useful measure for assessing psychological risk in ICE settings. Each of the MHCL scales contributes unique information in this regard, particularly when combined with assessment of physical complaints.

Bibliography: Description: (Last Updated: 12/23/2022) 

Show Cumulative Bibliography
 
Articles in Peer-reviewed Journals Kim J, Cifre A, Bower J, Connaboy C, Simpson R, Alfano C. "Markers of distress among behavioral and physical health evacuees prior to emergency departure from Antarctica." Acta Astronaut. 2022 Oct 31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2022.10.052 , Oct-2021
Project Title:  Characterization of Psychological Risk, Overlap with Physical Health, and Associated Performance in Isolated, Confined, Extreme (ICE) Environments Reduce
Images: icon  Fiscal Year: FY 2022 
Division: Human Research 
Research Discipline/Element:
HRP HFBP:Human Factors & Behavioral Performance (IRP Rev H)
Start Date: 11/13/2014  
End Date: 09/30/2022  
Task Last Updated: 08/04/2021 
Download report in PDF pdf
Principal Investigator/Affiliation:   Alfano, Candice  Ph.D. / University of Houston 
Address:  Psychology Department 
126 Heyne Bldg 
Houston , TX 77204-5022 
Email: caalfano@uh.edu 
Phone: 713-743-8611  
Congressional District: 18 
Web:  
Organization Type: UNIVERSITY 
Organization Name: University of Houston 
Joint Agency:  
Comments:  
Co-Investigator(s)
Affiliation: 
Connaboy, Christopher  Ph.D. University of Pittsburgh 
Simpson, Richard  Ph.D. University of Houston 
Gallagher, Matthew  Ph.D. University of Houston 
Key Personnel Changes / Previous PI: July 2021 report: Dr. Matthew Gallagher was added as a Co-Investigator-statistician during the NCE starting in April 2020; Dr. Mitzi Laughlin is no longer CoI on the project.
Project Information: Grant/Contract No. NNX15AC13G 
Responsible Center: NASA JSC 
Grant Monitor: Whitmire, Alexandra  
Center Contact:  
alexandra.m.whitmire@nasa.gov 
Unique ID: 10168 
Solicitation / Funding Source: 2013-14 HERO NNJ13ZSA002N-BMED Behavioral Health & Performance 
Grant/Contract No.: NNX15AC13G 
Project Type: GROUND 
Flight Program:  
TechPort: No 
No. of Post Docs:
No. of PhD Candidates:
No. of Master's Candidates:
No. of Bachelor's Candidates:
No. of PhD Degrees:
No. of Master's Degrees:
No. of Bachelor's Degrees:
Human Research Program Elements: (1) HFBP:Human Factors & Behavioral Performance (IRP Rev H)
Human Research Program Risks: (1) BMed:Risk of Adverse Cognitive or Behavioral Conditions and Psychiatric Disorders
Human Research Program Gaps: (1) BMed-101:We need to identify, quantify, and validate the key selection factors for astronaut cognitive and behavioral strengths (e.g., resiliency) and operationally-relevant performance threats for increasingly Earth independent, long-duration, autonomous, and/or long-distance exploration missions.
(2) BMed-102:Given exposures to spaceflight hazards (space radiation, isolation), how do we identify individual susceptibility, monitor molecular/biomarkers and acceptable thresholds, and validate behavioral health and CNS/neurological/neuropsychological performance measures and domains of relevance to exploration class missions?
(3) BMed-103:What are the validated, efficacious treatments (individual or Team-based) and/or countermeasures to prevent adverse behavioral conditions, CNS/neurological, and/or psychiatric disorders caused by either single and/or integrated exposures to spaceflight hazards during exploration class missions?
(4) BMed-108:Given each crewmember will experience multiple spaceflight hazards simultaneously, we need to identify and characterize the potential additive, antagonistic, or synergistic impacts of multiple stressors (e.g., space radiation, altered gravity, isolation, altered immune, altered sleep) on crew health and/or CNS/ cognitive functioning to develop threshold limits and validate countermeasures for any identified adverse crew health and/or operationally-relevant performance outcomes.
Flight Assignment/Project Notes: NOTE: End date changed to 9/30/2022 per NSSC information (Ed., 8/24/21)

NOTE: End date changed to 9/30/2021 per NSSC information (Ed., 4/22/2020)

NOTE: End date changed to 3/31/2020 per NSSC information (Ed., 1/29/2020)

NOTE: End date changed to 12/31/2019 per NSSC information (Ed., 7/17/19)

NOTE: End date changed to 5/31/2019 per NSSC information (Ed., 2/12/19)

NOTE: End date changed to 1/31/2019 per NSSC information (Ed., 12/28/18)

NOTE: End date changed to 11/12/2018 per NSSC information (Ed., 12/13/17)

NOTE: Element change to Human Factors & Behavioral Performance; previously Behavioral Health & Performance (Ed., 1/17/17)

Task Description: Anecdotal and empirical findings collected in space and other extreme environments continue to highlight the potential for psychological symptoms and conditions to degrade crew performance, increase conflict, and jeopardize mission success. Indeed, ‘negative reactions’ during periods of isolation, confinement, demanding work schedules, stimulus reduction, separation from loved ones, sleep deprivation, and a host of other stressors are more appropriately viewed as normative rather than pathogenic. Selection methods and countermeasures serve to mitigate some degree of psychological risk, but long-duration space flight will substantially extend exposure to these and other stressors. Previous research documenting psychological symptoms experienced during space flight and in other isolated and confined environments (ICE) provides evidence of a wide range of psychological and behavioral reactions.

Unfortunately however, these collective data ultimately serve to raise more questions than answers. Differences in collection methods, types of symptoms/reactions assessed, psychological constructs examined, and timing and duration of measurements limit conclusions that can be drawn from this research. As a result, understanding of the discrete symptoms and conditions most likely to occur during space flight and thus, ability to quantify the magnitude, probability, or consequences of such risk remains inadequate. The current project proposes to address these notable gaps in knowledge via three specific Aims. First, we will conduct extensive scientific literature reviews and interviews with subject matter experts in order to synthesize existing knowledge of the psychological and behavioral symptoms experienced in space and other extreme environments (Aim 1). Our review will directly inform the development of a comprehensive checklist of symptoms to be monitored among 6 separate cohorts (i.e., 2 Antarctic and 4 Human Exploration Research Analog (HERA) cohorts)) as part of a longitudinal investigation (Aim 2). Symptoms will be examined based on their point/period prevalence, severity, and duration. The checklist will also be administered (repeatedly) in conjunction with a physical symptoms checklist in order to examine concurrent and sequential overlap between psychological and physical health symptoms as means of clarifying potential etiologies. Finally, our study will extend previous research by exploring relationships among psychological health, sleep loss/dysregulation, biomarkers of stress, and performance-based outcomes (Aim 3). A comprehensive battery of cognitive and performance measures (including a perception-action coupling task) will be administered repeatedly as part of our longitudinal study. These outcomes will inform a final list of psychological/ behavioral symptoms to be examined during an extended International Space Station (ISS) mission.

Research Impact/Earth Benefits: Anecdotal and empirical findings collected in space and other extreme environments continue to highlight the potential for psychological symptoms and conditions to degrade crew performance, increase conflict, and jeopardize mission success. Indeed, ‘negative reactions’ during periods of isolation, confinement, demanding work schedules, stimulus reduction, separation from loved ones, sleep deprivation, and a host of other stressors are more appropriately viewed as normative rather than pathogenic. Selection methods and countermeasures serve to mitigate some degree of psychological risk, but long-duration space flight will substantially extend exposure to these and other stressors. Previous research documenting psychological symptoms experienced during space flight and in other isolated and confined environments (ICE) provides evidence of a wide range of psychological and behavioral reactions. Unfortunately however, these collective data ultimately serve to raise more questions than answers. Differences in collection methods, types of symptoms/reactions assessed, psychological constructs examined, and timing and duration of measurements limit conclusions that can be drawn from this research. As a result, understanding of the discrete symptoms and conditions most likely to occur during space flight and thus, ability to quantify the magnitude, probability, or consequences of such risk remains inadequate. Thus, there is a need to: (1) identify the psychological/behavioral symptoms that pose the greatest threat to performance; (2) provide accurate and acceptable risk thresholds; (3) inform screening and selection processes; (4) guide further development of suitable working practices (standard operating procedures); and (5) develop interventions and counter measures to mitigate these risks.

This project specifically addresses several knowledge gaps related to Risks of Adverse Behavioral Conditions and Psychiatric Disorders [Ed. note: August 2021--Gaps have changed since this grant was awarded in FY2015; see Human Research Roadmap https://humanresearchroadmap.nasa.gov/ ] including: Gap 1 (Need to identify and quantify the key threats to and promoters of mission relevant behavioral health and performance during exploration class missions) and Gap 3 (Need to identify and validate measures to monitor behavioral health and performance and determine acceptable thresholds for these measures during exploration missions). Our primary goal is to identify the psychological and behavioral health symptoms with the greatest likelihood of occurrence during extended human space flight/habitation to space and to estimate associated levels of threat imposed to mission-based performance. As a final deliverable, a checklist of symptoms will be developed for implementation during an ISS mission (>6 months) in order to determine its feasibility, reliability, and facilitation of evidence-based decision making with regard to crew health, safety, and mission success.

As a first step, we will conduct extensive scientific literature reviews and interviews with subject matter experts in order to synthesize existing knowledge of the psychological and behavioral symptoms experienced in space and other extreme environments (Aim 1). Our review will directly inform the development of a comprehensive checklist of symptoms to be monitored among 8 separate cohorts (i.e., 4 Antarctic and 4 HERA cohorts) as part of a longitudinal investigation (Aim 2). Symptoms will be examined based on their point/period prevalence, severity, and duration. The checklist will also be administered (repeatedly) in conjunction with the Space Medicine Exploration Medical Condition List (SMEMCL) in order to examine concurrent and sequential overlap between psychological and physical health symptoms as means of clarifying potential etiologies. Finally, our study will extend previous research by exploring relationships among psychological health, sleep loss/dysregulation, biomarkers of stress, and performance-based outcomes (Aim 3). A comprehensive battery of cognitive and performance measures (including a perception-action coupling task) will be administered repeatedly as part of our longitudinal study. These outcomes will inform a final list of psychological/ behavioral symptoms to be examined during an extended ISS mission.

Task Progress & Bibliography Information FY2022 
Task Progress: During the past year, we published several papers from our Antarctic study, including primary mental health outcomes. Among the three Mental Health Checklist (MHCL) subscales, both positive adaptation and poor self-regulation scores changed significantly across the 9-month mission. For positive adaptation, a continuous linear decrease was observed from baseline to the end of the mission. Thus, even as crew members were preparing to return home, positive adaptation scores did not evidence a ‘bounce back’ effect. Deterioration in the range of items that make up this MHCL subscale (e.g., proud, inspired, enthused/spirited, interested/fascinated, perfectionistic) might be viewed as progressive feelings of detachment or indifference over time. For MHCL poor-regulation scores, the greatest increases were observed during the first half of the mission. Scores decreased somewhat in later months, though not back to baseline levels. Interestingly, higher poor self-regulation scores were observed early in the mission at McMurdo compared to the South Pole station. Considering the harsher, more extreme conditions at the South Pole, and the absence of station-based differences in demographic, military, or prior polar experience, poorer self-regulation scores at McMurdo may reflect the absence of pre-deployment psychological screening at this station. By comparison, monthly MHCL anxious apprehension scores did not change significantly over time. Thus, whereas declines in both positive emotion and self-regulatory abilities may be more universal experiences in this ICE setting, changes in anxiety might be shaped more so by individual (e.g., physical symptoms), situational, and/or interactional effects than by broader environmental stressors. We did observe persistently higher MHCL anxious apprehension scores at McMurdo station where weather elements are less extreme but the population is much larger. A potentially important direction for future work is to examine whether and how reports of anxious apprehension are affected by acute interpersonal stressors.

We also examined changes in the severity of physical symptoms across mission, finding significant increases from baseline to the end of study at both stations. Elevation in physical symptoms during mission also predicted end of study poor self-regulation and anxious apprehension. Monthly levels of cortisol and cortisol:DHEA ratios were higher in McMurdo compared to South Pole participants indicating greater experiences of stress at the coastal station. Again, the larger McMurdo population likely influences levels of psychosocial stress; laboratory-based studies incorporating social stress paradigms have routinely been shown to evoke a cortisol response. In conjunction with higher MHCL anxious apprehension scores, findings are suggestive of higher levels of arousal/activation at McMurdo.

Assessment of within-mission use of regulatory strategies indicated that savoring, reappraisal, and self-focused rumination were more often used in response to positive emotions than dampening and suppression. This pattern of responding is generally considered adaptive, as the former strategies are associated with effectively increasing and maintaining positive affect. Decreased use of suppression over time was also associated with greater end of study positive adaptation scores, aligning with community-based findings showing that, in addition to being cognitively taxing, suppression results in worsened emotional outcomes. Interestingly, savoring was significantly reduced late in the mission and at the end of the study, when positive adaptation scores were lowest.

We also examined whether several trait-based constructs assessed at baseline predicted MHCL scores at the end of the study. Controlling for baseline positive adaptation scores, higher baseline Difficulties with Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) scores predicted less positive adaptation at the end of the study.

Overall, our findings add to a limited body of literature regarding mental health changes in the Antarctic. In all subjects, positive adaptation scores progressively decreased across the study, suggestive of increasing feelings of detachment and/or indifference over time. Conversely, poor self-regulation scores increased across the study and were predicted by co-occurring increases in the severity of physical symptoms. One particularly novel aspect of our study was the assessment of within-mission use of strategies for regulating positive emotion. These data suggest that greater expression of positive emotions and savoring positive experiences may provide a buffer against typical decreases in positive adaptation that occur over long periods in ICE environments. Interventions and/or countermeasures directed at sustaining and enhancing positive emotions across extended missions may therefore be useful tool for reducing psychological risk.

Bibliography: Description: (Last Updated: 12/23/2022) 

Show Cumulative Bibliography
 
Abstracts for Journals and Proceedings Cifre AB, Kim J, So CJ, Gonzalez R, Abeln V, Alfano CA. "Global Sleep Quality as a Predictor of Mental Health During HERA Missions." Poster presented at the 2021 NASA Human Research Program Investigators’ Workshop, Virtual, February 1-4, 2021.

Abstracts. 2021 NASA Human Research Program Investigators’ Workshop, Virtual, February 1-4, 2021. , Feb-2021

Abstracts for Journals and Proceedings Kim J, Cifre AB, So CJ, Gonzalez R, Bower J, Connaboy C, Simpson R, Alfano CA. "Markers of Distress Among Medical and Behavioral Health Evacuees from Antarctica." Poster presented at the 2021 NASA Human Research Program Investigators’ Workshop, Virtual, February 1-4, 2021.

Abstracts. 2021 NASA Human Research Program Investigators’ Workshop, Virtual, February 1-4, 2021. , Feb-2021

Abstracts for Journals and Proceedings Alfano C, Mi Q, Ahamed NU, Bower JL, Connaboy C, Simpson RJ. "Sleep Regularity and Mental Health during Extended Antarctic." Paper presented at the 2021 NASA Human Research Program Investigators’ Workshop, Virtual, February 1-4, 2021.

Abstracts. 2021 NASA Human Research Program Investigators’ Workshop, Virtual, February 1-4, 2021. , Feb-2021

Articles in Peer-reviewed Journals Alfano CA, Bower JL, Connaboy C, Agha NH, Baker FL, Smith KA, So CJ, Simpson RJ. "Mental health, physical symptoms and biomarkers of stress during prolonged exposure to Antarctica’s extreme environment." Acta Astronautica. 2021 Apr;181:405-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2021.01.051 , Apr-2021
Articles in Peer-reviewed Journals Connaboy C, Sinnott AM, LaGoy A, Krajewski KT, Johnson CA, Pepping G-J, Simpson RJ, Bower JL, Alfano CA. "Cognitive performance during prolonged periods in isolated, confined, and extreme environments." Acta Astronautica. 2020 Dec;177:545-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.08.018 , Dec-2020
Articles in Peer-reviewed Journals LaGoy A, Sinnott AM, Ambarian M, Pepping G-J, Simpson RJ, Agha NH, Bower JL, Alfano CA, Connaboy C. "Differences in affordance-based behaviors within an isolated and confined environment are related to sleep, emotional health and physiological parameters." Acta Astronautica. 2020 Nov;176:238-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2020.06.034 , Nov-2020
Project Title:  Characterization of Psychological Risk, Overlap with Physical Health, and Associated Performance in Isolated, Confined, Extreme (ICE) Environments Reduce
Images: icon  Fiscal Year: FY 2020 
Division: Human Research 
Research Discipline/Element:
HRP HFBP:Human Factors & Behavioral Performance (IRP Rev H)
Start Date: 11/13/2014  
End Date: 09/30/2021  
Task Last Updated: 04/24/2020 
Download report in PDF pdf
Principal Investigator/Affiliation:   Alfano, Candice  Ph.D. / University of Houston 
Address:  Psychology Department 
126 Heyne Bldg 
Houston , TX 77204-5022 
Email: caalfano@uh.edu 
Phone: 713-743-8611  
Congressional District: 18 
Web:  
Organization Type: UNIVERSITY 
Organization Name: University of Houston 
Joint Agency:  
Comments:  
Co-Investigator(s)
Affiliation: 
Connaboy, Christopher  Ph.D. University of Pittsburgh 
Laughlin, Mitzi  Ph.D. University of Houston 
Simpson, Richard  Ph.D. University of Houston 
Key Personnel Changes / Previous PI: April 2020: None
Project Information: Grant/Contract No. NNX15AC13G 
Responsible Center: NASA JSC 
Grant Monitor: Williams, Thomas  
Center Contact: 281-483-8773 
thomas.j.will1@nasa.gov 
Unique ID: 10168 
Solicitation / Funding Source: 2013-14 HERO NNJ13ZSA002N-BMED Behavioral Health & Performance 
Grant/Contract No.: NNX15AC13G 
Project Type: GROUND 
Flight Program:  
TechPort: No 
No. of Post Docs:
No. of PhD Candidates:
No. of Master's Candidates:
No. of Bachelor's Candidates:
No. of PhD Degrees:
No. of Master's Degrees:
No. of Bachelor's Degrees:
Human Research Program Elements: (1) HFBP:Human Factors & Behavioral Performance (IRP Rev H)
Human Research Program Risks: (1) BMed:Risk of Adverse Cognitive or Behavioral Conditions and Psychiatric Disorders
Human Research Program Gaps: (1) BMed-101:We need to identify, quantify, and validate the key selection factors for astronaut cognitive and behavioral strengths (e.g., resiliency) and operationally-relevant performance threats for increasingly Earth independent, long-duration, autonomous, and/or long-distance exploration missions.
(2) BMed-102:Given exposures to spaceflight hazards (space radiation, isolation), how do we identify individual susceptibility, monitor molecular/biomarkers and acceptable thresholds, and validate behavioral health and CNS/neurological/neuropsychological performance measures and domains of relevance to exploration class missions?
(3) BMed-103:What are the validated, efficacious treatments (individual or Team-based) and/or countermeasures to prevent adverse behavioral conditions, CNS/neurological, and/or psychiatric disorders caused by either single and/or integrated exposures to spaceflight hazards during exploration class missions?
(4) BMed-108:Given each crewmember will experience multiple spaceflight hazards simultaneously, we need to identify and characterize the potential additive, antagonistic, or synergistic impacts of multiple stressors (e.g., space radiation, altered gravity, isolation, altered immune, altered sleep) on crew health and/or CNS/ cognitive functioning to develop threshold limits and validate countermeasures for any identified adverse crew health and/or operationally-relevant performance outcomes.
Flight Assignment/Project Notes: NOTE: End date changed to 9/30/2021 per NSSC information (Ed., 4/22/2020)

NOTE: End date changed to 3/31/2020 per NSSC information (Ed., 1/29/2020)

NOTE: End date changed to 12/31/2019 per NSSC information (Ed., 7/17/19)

NOTE: End date changed to 5/31/2019 per NSSC information (Ed., 2/12/19)

NOTE: End date changed to 1/31/2019 per NSSC information (Ed., 12/28/18)

NOTE: End date changed to 11/12/2018 per NSSC information (Ed., 12/13/17)

NOTE: Element change to Human Factors & Behavioral Performance; previously Behavioral Health & Performance (Ed., 1/17/17)

Task Description: Anecdotal and empirical findings collected in space and other extreme environments continue to highlight the potential for psychological symptoms and conditions to degrade crew performance, increase conflict, and jeopardize mission success. Indeed, ‘negative reactions’ during periods of isolation, confinement, demanding work schedules, stimulus reduction, separation from loved ones, sleep deprivation, and a host of other stressors are more appropriately viewed as normative rather than pathogenic. Selection methods and countermeasures serve to mitigate some degree of psychological risk, but long-duration space flight will substantially extend exposure to these and other stressors. Previous research documenting psychological symptoms experienced during space flight and in other isolated and confined environments (ICE) provides evidence of a wide range of psychological and behavioral reactions.

Unfortunately however, these collective data ultimately serve to raise more questions than answers. Differences in collection methods, types of symptoms/reactions assessed, psychological constructs examined, and timing and duration of measurements limit conclusions that can be drawn from this research. As a result, understanding of the discrete symptoms and conditions most likely to occur during space flight and thus, ability to quantify the magnitude, probability, or consequences of such risk remains inadequate. The current project proposes to address these notable gaps in knowledge via three specific Aims. First, we will conduct extensive scientific literature reviews and interviews with subject matter experts in order to synthesize existing knowledge of the psychological and behavioral symptoms experienced in space and other extreme environments (Aim 1). Our review will directly inform the development of a comprehensive checklist of symptoms to be monitored among 6 separate cohorts (i.e., 2 Antarctic and 4 Human Exploration Research Analog (HERA) cohorts) as part of a longitudinal investigation (Aim 2). Symptoms will be examined based on their point/period prevalence, severity, and duration. The checklist will also be administered (repeatedly) in conjunction with a physical symptoms checklist in order to examine concurrent and sequential overlap between psychological and physical health symptoms as means of clarifying potential etiologies. Finally, our study will extend previous research by exploring relationships among psychological health, sleep loss/dysregulation, biomarkers of stress, and performance-based outcomes (Aim 3). A comprehensive battery of cognitive and performance measures (including a perception-action coupling task) will be administered repeatedly as part of our longitudinal study. These outcomes will inform a final list of psychological/ behavioral symptoms to be examined during an extended International Space Station (ISS) mission.

Research Impact/Earth Benefits: Anecdotal and empirical findings collected in space and other extreme environments continue to highlight the potential for psychological symptoms and conditions to degrade crew performance, increase conflict, and jeopardize mission success. Indeed, ‘negative reactions’ during periods of isolation, confinement, demanding work schedules, stimulus reduction, separation from loved ones, sleep deprivation, and a host of other stressors are more appropriately viewed as normative rather than pathogenic. Selection methods and countermeasures serve to mitigate some degree of psychological risk, but long-duration space flight will substantially extend exposure to these and other stressors. Previous research documenting psychological symptoms experienced during space flight and in other isolated and confined environments (ICE) provides evidence of a wide range of psychological and behavioral reactions. Unfortunately however, these collective data ultimately serve to raise more questions than answers. Differences in collection methods, types of symptoms/reactions assessed, psychological constructs examined, and timing and duration of measurements limit conclusions that can be drawn from this research. As a result, understanding of the discrete symptoms and conditions most likely to occur during space flight and thus, ability to quantify the magnitude, probability, or consequences of such risk remains inadequate. Thus, there is a need to: (1) identify the psychological/behavioral symptoms that pose the greatest threat to performance; (2) provide accurate and acceptable risk thresholds; (3) inform screening and selection processes; (4) guide further development of suitable working practices (standard operating procedures); and (5) develop interventions and counter measures to mitigate these risks.

This project specifically addresses several knowledge gaps related to Risks of Adverse Behavioral Conditions and Psychiatric Disorders including: Gap 1 (Need to identify and quantify the key threats to and promoters of mission relevant behavioral health and performance during exploration class missions) and Gap 3 (Need to identify and validate measures to monitor behavioral health and performance and determine acceptable thresholds for these measures during exploration missions). Our primary goal is to identify the psychological and behavioral health symptoms with the greatest likelihood of occurrence during extended human space flight/habitation to space and to estimate associated levels of threat imposed to mission-based performance. As a final deliverable, a checklist of symptoms will be developed for implementation during an ISS mission (>6 months) in order to determine its feasibility, reliability, and facilitation of evidence-based decision making with regard to crew health, safety, and mission success.

As a first step, we will conduct extensive scientific literature reviews and interviews with subject matter experts in order to synthesize existing knowledge of the psychological and behavioral symptoms experienced in space and other extreme environments (Aim 1). Our review will directly inform the development of a comprehensive checklist of symptoms to be monitored among 8 separate cohorts (i.e., 4 Antarctic and 4 HERA cohorts) as part of a longitudinal investigation (Aim 2). Symptoms will be examined based on their point/period prevalence, severity, and duration. The checklist will also be administered (repeatedly) in conjunction with the Space Medicine Exploration Medical Condition List (SMEMCL) in order to examine concurrent and sequential overlap between psychological and physical health symptoms as means of clarifying potential etiologies. Finally, our study will extend previous research by exploring relationships among psychological health, sleep loss/dysregulation, biomarkers of stress, and performance-based outcomes (Aim 3). A comprehensive battery of cognitive and performance measures (including a perception-action coupling task) will be administered repeatedly as part of our longitudinal study. These outcomes will inform a final list of psychological/ behavioral symptoms to be examined during an extended ISS mission.

Task Progress & Bibliography Information FY2020 
Task Progress: All major project objectives have been met. Main outcomes regarding our Mental Health Checklist (MHCL) measure in the Antarctic study, including participants who were stationed at the South Pole station or the McMurdo station, are currently under peer review. Secondary outcomes including sleep and cognitive testing are currently being prepared for submission. Main outcomes were presented at the Johnson Space Center in June 2019. During the approved no cost extension period we are seeking to further validate our MHCL measure in several additional populations including an additional Antarctic sample, elite athletes, and special forces soldiers.

Bibliography: Description: (Last Updated: 12/23/2022) 

Show Cumulative Bibliography
 
Abstracts for Journals and Proceedings Alfano CA. "Psychological Risk, Sleep Patterns and Physical Health in the Antarctic during Winterover." Presented at the Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, June 2019.

National Aeronatics and Space Administation (NASA) Johnson Space Center, 2019. , Jun-2019

Abstracts for Journals and Proceedings Alfano CA, Bower JL, McLaughlin M, Connaboy C, Simpson R. "Somatic Complaints and Biomarkers of Stress as Predictors of Mental Health in the Antarctic." Paper presented at the 2020 NASA Human Research Program Investigators’ Workshop, Galveston, TX, January 27-30, 2020.

Abstracts. 2020 NASA Human Research Program Investigators’ Workshop, Galveston, TX, January 27-30, 2020. , Jan-2020

Abstracts for Journals and Proceedings Alfano CA, Bower J, McLaughlin M, Connaboy C, Simpson RJ. "Prevalence, Severity and Course of Mental Health Symptoms during Antarctic Winterover." Paper presented at the 2019 NASA Human Research Program Investigators’ Workshop, Galveston, TX, January 22-25, 2019.

Abstracts. 2019 NASA Human Research Program Investigators’ Workshop, Galveston, TX, January 22-25, 2019. , Jan-2019

Articles in Peer-reviewed Journals Bower JL, Laughlin MS, Connaboy C, Simpson RJ, Alfano CA. "Factor structure and validation of the mental health checklist (MHCL) for use in isolated, confined and extreme environments." Acta Astronaut. 2019 Aug;161:405-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.03.007 , Aug-2019
Articles in Peer-reviewed Journals Connaboy C, Johnson CD, LaGoy AD, Pepping GJ, Simpson RJ, Deng Z, Ma L, Bower JL, Eagle SR, Flanagan SD, Alfano CA. "Intersession reliability and within-session stability of a novel perception-action coupling task." Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2019 Feb 1;90(2):77-83. https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.5190.2019 ; PubMed PMID: 30670116 , Feb-2019
Articles in Peer-reviewed Journals Johnson CD, LaGoy AD, Pepping GJ, Eagle SR, Beethe AZ, Bower JL, Alfano CA, Simpson RJ, Connaboy C. "Action boundary proximity effects on perceptual-motor judgments." Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2019 Dec 1;90(12):1000-8. https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.5376.2019 ; PubMed PMID: 31747996 , Dec-2019
Articles in Peer-reviewed Journals Connaboy C, LaGoy AD, Johnson CD, Sinnott AM, Eagle SR, Bower JL, Pepping G-J, Simpson RJ, Alfano CA. "Sleep deprivation impairs affordance perception behavior during an action boundary accuracy assessment." Acta Astronaut. 2020 Jan;166:270-6. Epub 2019 Oct 22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.10.029 , Jan-2020
Project Title:  Characterization of Psychological Risk, Overlap with Physical Health, and Associated Performance in Isolated, Confined, Extreme (ICE) Environments Reduce
Images: icon  Fiscal Year: FY 2019 
Division: Human Research 
Research Discipline/Element:
HRP HFBP:Human Factors & Behavioral Performance (IRP Rev H)
Start Date: 11/13/2014  
End Date: 12/31/2019  
Task Last Updated: 10/15/2018 
Download report in PDF pdf
Principal Investigator/Affiliation:   Alfano, Candice  Ph.D. / University of Houston 
Address:  Psychology Department 
126 Heyne Bldg 
Houston , TX 77204-5022 
Email: caalfano@uh.edu 
Phone: 713-743-8611  
Congressional District: 18 
Web:  
Organization Type: UNIVERSITY 
Organization Name: University of Houston 
Joint Agency:  
Comments:  
Co-Investigator(s)
Affiliation: 
Connaboy, Christopher  Ph.D. University of Pittsburgh 
Laughlin, Mitzi  Ph.D. University of Houston 
Simpson, Richard  Ph.D. University of Houston 
Key Personnel Changes / Previous PI: October 2018 report: Zhigang Deng and Michael Zolensky are no longer CoInvestigators on the project.
Project Information: Grant/Contract No. NNX15AC13G 
Responsible Center: NASA JSC 
Grant Monitor: Williams, Thomas  
Center Contact: 281-483-8773 
thomas.j.will1@nasa.gov 
Unique ID: 10168 
Solicitation / Funding Source: 2013-14 HERO NNJ13ZSA002N-BMED Behavioral Health & Performance 
Grant/Contract No.: NNX15AC13G 
Project Type: GROUND 
Flight Program:  
TechPort: No 
No. of Post Docs:
No. of PhD Candidates:
No. of Master's Candidates:
No. of Bachelor's Candidates:
No. of PhD Degrees:
No. of Master's Degrees:
No. of Bachelor's Degrees:
Human Research Program Elements: (1) HFBP:Human Factors & Behavioral Performance (IRP Rev H)
Human Research Program Risks: (1) BMed:Risk of Adverse Cognitive or Behavioral Conditions and Psychiatric Disorders
Human Research Program Gaps: (1) BMed-101:We need to identify, quantify, and validate the key selection factors for astronaut cognitive and behavioral strengths (e.g., resiliency) and operationally-relevant performance threats for increasingly Earth independent, long-duration, autonomous, and/or long-distance exploration missions.
(2) BMed-102:Given exposures to spaceflight hazards (space radiation, isolation), how do we identify individual susceptibility, monitor molecular/biomarkers and acceptable thresholds, and validate behavioral health and CNS/neurological/neuropsychological performance measures and domains of relevance to exploration class missions?
(3) BMed-103:What are the validated, efficacious treatments (individual or Team-based) and/or countermeasures to prevent adverse behavioral conditions, CNS/neurological, and/or psychiatric disorders caused by either single and/or integrated exposures to spaceflight hazards during exploration class missions?
(4) BMed-108:Given each crewmember will experience multiple spaceflight hazards simultaneously, we need to identify and characterize the potential additive, antagonistic, or synergistic impacts of multiple stressors (e.g., space radiation, altered gravity, isolation, altered immune, altered sleep) on crew health and/or CNS/ cognitive functioning to develop threshold limits and validate countermeasures for any identified adverse crew health and/or operationally-relevant performance outcomes.
Flight Assignment/Project Notes: NOTE: End date changed to 12/31/2019 per NSSC information (Ed., 7/17/19)

NOTE: End date changed to 5/31/2019 per NSSC information (Ed., 2/12/19)

NOTE: End date changed to 1/31/2019 per NSSC information (Ed., 12/28/18)

NOTE: End date changed to 11/12/2018 per NSSC information (Ed., 12/13/17)

NOTE: Element change to Human Factors & Behavioral Performance; previously Behavioral Health & Performance (Ed., 1/17/17)

Task Description: Anecdotal and empirical findings collected in space and other extreme environments continue to highlight the potential for psychological symptoms and conditions to degrade crew performance, increase conflict, and jeopardize mission success. Indeed, ‘negative reactions’ during periods of isolation, confinement, demanding work schedules, stimulus reduction, separation from loved ones, sleep deprivation, and a host of other stressors are more appropriately viewed as normative rather than pathogenic. Selection methods and countermeasures serve to mitigate some degree of psychological risk, but long-duration space flight will substantially extend exposure to these and other stressors. Previous research documenting psychological symptoms experienced during space flight and in other isolated and confined environments (ICE) provides evidence of a wide range of psychological and behavioral reactions.

Unfortunately however, these collective data ultimately serve to raise more questions than answers. Differences in collection methods, types of symptoms/reactions assessed, psychological constructs examined, and timing and duration of measurements limit conclusions that can be drawn from this research. As a result, understanding of the discrete symptoms and conditions most likely to occur during space flight and thus, ability to quantify the magnitude, probability, or consequences of such risk remains inadequate. The current project proposes to address these notable gaps in knowledge via three specific Aims. First, we will conduct extensive scientific literature reviews and interviews with subject matter experts in order to synthesize existing knowledge of the psychological and behavioral symptoms experienced in space and other extreme environments (Aim 1). Our review will directly inform the development of a comprehensive checklist of symptoms to be monitored among 6 separate cohorts (i.e., 2 Antarctic and 4 Human Exploration Research Analog (HERA) cohorts) as part of a longitudinal investigation (Aim 2). Symptoms will be examined based on their point/period prevalence, severity, and duration. The checklist will also be administered (repeatedly) in conjunction with a physical symptoms checklist in order to examine concurrent and sequential overlap between psychological and physical health symptoms as means of clarifying potential etiologies. Finally, our study will extend previous research by exploring relationships among psychological health, sleep loss/dysregulation, biomarkers of stress, and performance-based outcomes (Aim 3). A comprehensive battery of cognitive and performance measures (including a perception-action coupling task) will be administered repeatedly as part of our longitudinal study. These outcomes will inform a final list of psychological/ behavioral symptoms to be examined during an extended International Space Station (ISS) mission.

Research Impact/Earth Benefits: Anecdotal and empirical findings collected in space and other extreme environments continue to highlight the potential for psychological symptoms and conditions to degrade crew performance, increase conflict, and jeopardize mission success. Indeed, ‘negative reactions’ during periods of isolation, confinement, demanding work schedules, stimulus reduction, separation from loved ones, sleep deprivation, and a host of other stressors are more appropriately viewed as normative rather than pathogenic. Selection methods and countermeasures serve to mitigate some degree of psychological risk, but long-duration space flight will substantially extend exposure to these and other stressors. Previous research documenting psychological symptoms experienced during space flight and in other isolated and confined environments (ICE) provides evidence of a wide range of psychological and behavioral reactions. Unfortunately however, these collective data ultimately serve to raise more questions than answers. Differences in collection methods, types of symptoms/reactions assessed, psychological constructs examined, and timing and duration of measurements limit conclusions that can be drawn from this research. As a result, understanding of the discrete symptoms and conditions most likely to occur during space flight and thus, ability to quantify the magnitude, probability, or consequences of such risk remains inadequate. Thus, there is a need to: (1) identify the psychological/behavioral symptoms that pose the greatest threat to performance; (2) provide accurate and acceptable risk thresholds; (3) inform screening and selection processes; (4) guide further development of suitable working practices (standard operating procedures); and (5) develop interventions and counter measures to mitigate these risks.

This project specifically addresses several knowledge gaps related to Risks of Adverse Behavioral Conditions and Psychiatric Disorders including; Gaps 1 (Need to identify and quantify the key threats to and promoters of mission relevant behavioral health and performance during exploration class missions) and Gap 3 (Need to identify and validate measures to monitor behavioral health and performance and determine acceptable thresholds for these measures during exploration missions). Our primary goal is to identify the psychological and behavioral health symptoms with the greatest likelihood of occurrence during extended human space flight/habitation to space and to estimate associated levels of threat imposed to mission-based performance. As a final deliverable, a checklist of symptoms will be developed for implementation during an ISS mission (>6 months) in order to determine its feasibility, reliability, and facilitation of evidence-based decision making with regard to crew health, safety, and mission success.

As a first step, we will conduct extensive scientific literature reviews and interviews with subject matter experts in order to synthesize existing knowledge of the psychological and behavioral symptoms experienced in space and other extreme environments (Aim 1). Our review will directly inform the development of a comprehensive checklist of symptoms to be monitored among 8 separate cohorts (i.e., 4 Antarctic and 4 HERA cohorts) as part of a longitudinal investigation (Aim 2). Symptoms will be examined based on their point/period prevalence, severity, and duration. The checklist will also be administered (repeatedly) in conjunction with the Space Medicine Exploration Medical Condition List (SMEMCL) in order to examine concurrent and sequential overlap between psychological and physical health symptoms as means of clarifying potential etiologies. Finally, our study will extend previous research by exploring relationships among psychological health, sleep loss/dysregulation, biomarkers of stress, and performance-based outcomes (Aim 3). A comprehensive battery of cognitive and performance measures (including a perception-action coupling task) will be administered repeatedly as part of our longitudinal study. These outcomes will inform a final list of psychological/ behavioral symptoms to be examined during an extended ISS mission.

Task Progress & Bibliography Information FY2019 
Task Progress: During the past year, we completed data collection at two Antarctic stations including one coastal and one inland station (N=106). A total of N=106 participants completed the study, including n=19 at the inland station and n=87 at the coastal station. We subsequently received all data and equipment back from the Antarctic and are in the process of cleaning and analyzing all results. Primary outcomes will be presented at NASA's Human Research Program Investigators' Workshop in January 2019.

We also recently completed an initial validation study of our Mental Health Checklist (MHCL) including exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses of the checklist in a community sample and examination of reliability and convergent validity in our Antarctic sample (N=106). This manuscript is currently under review for publication (Bower, Laughlin, Simpson & Alfano, 2018).

Bibliography: Description: (Last Updated: 12/23/2022) 

Show Cumulative Bibliography
 
Abstracts for Journals and Proceedings Alfano CA, Bower J, Connaboy C, Simpson RJ. "Psychological Risk and Overlap with Physical Health in the Human Exploration Research Analog (HERA)." Presented at the 2018 NASA Human Research Program Investigators’ Workshop, Galveston, TX, January 22-25, 2018.

2018 NASA Human Research Program Investigators’ Workshop, Galveston, TX, January 22-25, 2018. , Jan-2018

Articles in Peer-reviewed Journals Alfano CA, Bower J, Cowie J, Lau S, Simpson RJ. "Long-duration space exploration and emotional health: Recommendations for conceptualizing and evaluating risk." Acta Astronaut. 2018 Jan;142:289-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.11.009 , Jan-2018
Project Title:  Characterization of Psychological Risk, Overlap with Physical Health, and Associated Performance in Isolated, Confined, Extreme (ICE) Environments Reduce
Images: icon  Fiscal Year: FY 2018 
Division: Human Research 
Research Discipline/Element:
HRP HFBP:Human Factors & Behavioral Performance (IRP Rev H)
Start Date: 11/13/2014  
End Date: 11/12/2018  
Task Last Updated: 09/11/2017 
Download report in PDF pdf
Principal Investigator/Affiliation:   Alfano, Candice  Ph.D. / University of Houston 
Address:  Psychology Department 
126 Heyne Bldg 
Houston , TX 77204-5022 
Email: caalfano@uh.edu 
Phone: 713-743-8611  
Congressional District: 18 
Web:  
Organization Type: UNIVERSITY 
Organization Name: University of Houston 
Joint Agency:  
Comments:  
Co-Investigator(s)
Affiliation: 
Connaboy, Christopher  Ph.D. University of Pittsburgh 
Laughlin, Mitzi  Ph.D. University of Houston 
Simpson, Richard  Ph.D. University of Houston 
Deng, Zhigang  Ph.D. University of Houston 
Zolensky, Michael  Ph.D. NASA Johnson Space Center 
Key Personnel Changes / Previous PI: None
Project Information: Grant/Contract No. NNX15AC13G 
Responsible Center: NASA JSC 
Grant Monitor: Williams, Thomas  
Center Contact: 281-483-8773 
thomas.j.will1@nasa.gov 
Unique ID: 10168 
Solicitation / Funding Source: 2013-14 HERO NNJ13ZSA002N-BMED Behavioral Health & Performance 
Grant/Contract No.: NNX15AC13G 
Project Type: GROUND 
Flight Program:  
TechPort: No 
No. of Post Docs:
No. of PhD Candidates:
No. of Master's Candidates:
No. of Bachelor's Candidates:
No. of PhD Degrees:
No. of Master's Degrees:
No. of Bachelor's Degrees:
Human Research Program Elements: (1) HFBP:Human Factors & Behavioral Performance (IRP Rev H)
Human Research Program Risks: (1) BMed:Risk of Adverse Cognitive or Behavioral Conditions and Psychiatric Disorders
Human Research Program Gaps: (1) BMed-101:We need to identify, quantify, and validate the key selection factors for astronaut cognitive and behavioral strengths (e.g., resiliency) and operationally-relevant performance threats for increasingly Earth independent, long-duration, autonomous, and/or long-distance exploration missions.
(2) BMed-102:Given exposures to spaceflight hazards (space radiation, isolation), how do we identify individual susceptibility, monitor molecular/biomarkers and acceptable thresholds, and validate behavioral health and CNS/neurological/neuropsychological performance measures and domains of relevance to exploration class missions?
(3) BMed-103:What are the validated, efficacious treatments (individual or Team-based) and/or countermeasures to prevent adverse behavioral conditions, CNS/neurological, and/or psychiatric disorders caused by either single and/or integrated exposures to spaceflight hazards during exploration class missions?
(4) BMed-108:Given each crewmember will experience multiple spaceflight hazards simultaneously, we need to identify and characterize the potential additive, antagonistic, or synergistic impacts of multiple stressors (e.g., space radiation, altered gravity, isolation, altered immune, altered sleep) on crew health and/or CNS/ cognitive functioning to develop threshold limits and validate countermeasures for any identified adverse crew health and/or operationally-relevant performance outcomes.
Flight Assignment/Project Notes: NOTE: End date changed to 11/12/2018 per NSSC information (Ed., 12/13/17)

NOTE: Element change to Human Factors & Behavioral Performance; previously Behavioral Health & Performance (Ed., 1/17/17)

Task Description: Anecdotal and empirical findings collected in space and other extreme environments continue to highlight the potential for psychological symptoms and conditions to degrade crew performance, increase conflict, and jeopardize mission success. Indeed, ‘negative reactions’ during periods of isolation, confinement, demanding work schedules, stimulus reduction, separation from loved ones, sleep deprivation, and a host of other stressors are more appropriately viewed as normative rather than pathogenic. Selection methods and countermeasures serve to mitigate some degree of psychological risk, but long-duration space flight will substantially extend exposure to these and other stressors. Previous research documenting psychological symptoms experienced during space flight and in other isolated and confined environments (ICE) provides evidence of a wide range of psychological and behavioral reactions.

Unfortunately however, these collective data ultimately serve to raise more questions than answers. Differences in collection methods, types of symptoms/reactions assessed, psychological constructs examined, and timing and duration of measurements limit conclusions that can be drawn from this research. As a result, understanding of the discrete symptoms and conditions most likely to occur during space flight and thus, ability to quantify the magnitude, probability, or consequences of such risk remains inadequate. The current project proposes to address these notable gaps in knowledge via three specific Aims. First, we will conduct extensive scientific literature reviews and interviews with subject matter experts in order to synthesize existing knowledge of the psychological and behavioral symptoms experienced in space and other extreme environments (Aim 1). Our review will directly inform the development of a comprehensive checklist of symptoms to be monitored among 6 separate cohorts (i.e., 2 Antarctic and 4 Human Exploration Research Analog (HERA) cohorts) as part of a longitudinal investigation (Aim 2). Symptoms will be examined based on their point/period prevalence, severity, and duration. The checklist will also be administered (repeatedly) in conjunction with a physical symptoms checklist in order to examine concurrent and sequential overlap between psychological and physical health symptoms as means of clarifying potential etiologies. Finally, our study will extend previous research by exploring relationships among psychological health, sleep loss/dysregulation, biomarkers of stress, and performance-based outcomes (Aim 3). A comprehensive battery of cognitive and performance measures (including a perception-action coupling task) will be administered repeatedly as part of our longitudinal study. These outcomes will inform a final list of psychological/ behavioral symptoms to be examined during an extended International Space Station (ISS) mission.

Research Impact/Earth Benefits: Anecdotal and empirical findings collected in space and other extreme environments continue to highlight the potential for psychological symptoms and conditions to degrade crew performance, increase conflict, and jeopardize mission success. Indeed, ‘negative reactions’ during periods of isolation, confinement, demanding work schedules, stimulus reduction, separation from loved ones, sleep deprivation, and a host of other stressors are more appropriately viewed as normative rather than pathogenic. Selection methods and countermeasures serve to mitigate some degree of psychological risk, but long-duration space flight will substantially extend exposure to these and other stressors. Previous research documenting psychological symptoms experienced during space flight and in other isolated and confined environments (ICE) provides evidence of a wide range of psychological and behavioral reactions. Unfortunately however, these collective data ultimately serve to raise more questions than answers. Differences in collection methods, types of symptoms/reactions assessed, psychological constructs examined, and timing and duration of measurements limit conclusions that can be drawn from this research. As a result, understanding of the discrete symptoms and conditions most likely to occur during space flight and thus, ability to quantify the magnitude, probability, or consequences of such risk remains inadequate. Thus, there is a need to: (1) identify the psychological/behavioral symptoms that pose the greatest threat to performance; (2) provide accurate and acceptable risk thresholds; (3) inform screening and selection processes; (4) guide further development of suitable working practices (standard operating procedures); and (5) develop interventions and counter measures to mitigate these risks.

This project specifically addresses several knowledge gaps related to Risks of Adverse Behavioral Conditions and Psychiatric Disorders including; Gaps 1 (Need to identify and quantify the key threats to and promoters of mission relevant behavioral health and performance during exploration class missions) and Gap 3 (Need to identify and validate measures to monitor behavioral health and performance and determine acceptable thresholds for these measures during exploration missions). Our primary goal is to identify the psychological and behavioral health symptoms with the greatest likelihood of occurrence during extended human space flight/habitation to space and to estimate associated levels of threat imposed to mission-based performance. As a final deliverable, a checklist of symptoms will be developed for implementation during an ISS mission (>6 months) in order to determine its feasibility, reliability, and facilitation of evidence-based decision making with regard to crew health, safety, and mission success.

As a first step, we will conduct extensive scientific literature reviews and interviews with subject matter experts in order to synthesize existing knowledge of the psychological and behavioral symptoms experienced in space and other extreme environments (Aim 1). Our review will directly inform the development of a comprehensive checklist of symptoms to be monitored among 8 separate cohorts (i.e., 4 Antarctic and 4 HERA cohorts) as part of a longitudinal investigation (Aim 2). Symptoms will be examined based on their point/period prevalence, severity, and duration. The checklist will also be administered (repeatedly) in conjunction with the Space Medicine Exploration Medical Condition List (SMEMCL) in order to examine concurrent and sequential overlap between psychological and physical health symptoms as means of clarifying potential etiologies. Finally, our study will extend previous research by exploring relationships among psychological health, sleep loss/dysregulation, biomarkers of stress, and performance-based outcomes (Aim 3). A comprehensive battery of cognitive and performance measures (including a perception-action coupling task) will be administered repeatedly as part of our longitudinal study. These outcomes will inform a final list of psychological/ behavioral symptoms to be examined during an extended ISS mission.

Task Progress & Bibliography Information FY2018 
Task Progress: All study objectives have been met during the past year of the project. Specifically:

1) We completed data collection from the 2016 HERA campaign (4 missions). We are cleaning and aggregating these data at present. Findings will be presented at the 2018 NASA Human Research Program (HRP) investigators’ workshop in January 2018 and subsequently submitted for publication. 2) Data collection in 2 Antarctic stations is ongoing with support from Dr. Jim McKeith and the Center for Polar Medical Operations. At South Pole, a total of 21 participants have been recruited, and at McMurdo, 88 participants have been recruited. Data collection will be completed in November 2017, after which data will be cleaned and analyzed prior to publication in peer-reviewed journals.

3) Our comprehensive technical report titled, “Long-Duration Space Exploration and Emotional Health: Recommendations for Conceptualizing and Evaluating Risk” received feedback from HRP staff. The overarching goals of this report were to provide an integrative summary of emotion-based outcomes from previous studies in isolated, confined, extreme (ICE) environments and to provide specific recommendations for future research. These findings have also been submitted to a peer-reviewed journal and are currently undergoing revisions prior to publication.

Bibliography: Description: (Last Updated: 12/23/2022) 

Show Cumulative Bibliography
 
 None in FY 2018
Project Title:  Characterization of Psychological Risk, Overlap with Physical Health, and Associated Performance in Isolated, Confined, Extreme (ICE) Environments Reduce
Images: icon  Fiscal Year: FY 2017 
Division: Human Research 
Research Discipline/Element:
HRP HFBP:Human Factors & Behavioral Performance (IRP Rev H)
Start Date: 11/13/2014  
End Date: 11/12/2017  
Task Last Updated: 08/26/2016 
Download report in PDF pdf
Principal Investigator/Affiliation:   Alfano, Candice  Ph.D. / University of Houston 
Address:  Psychology Department 
126 Heyne Bldg 
Houston , TX 77204-5022 
Email: caalfano@uh.edu 
Phone: 713-743-8611  
Congressional District: 18 
Web:  
Organization Type: UNIVERSITY 
Organization Name: University of Houston 
Joint Agency:  
Comments:  
Co-Investigator(s)
Affiliation: 
Connaboy, Christopher  University of Pittsburgh 
Laughlin, Mitzi  Ph.D. University of Houston 
Simpson, Richard  Ph.D. University of Houston 
Deng, Zhigang  Ph.D. University of Houston 
Zolensky, Michael  Ph.D. NASA Johnson Space Center 
Key Personnel Changes / Previous PI: None
Project Information: Grant/Contract No. NNX15AC13G 
Responsible Center: NASA JSC 
Grant Monitor: Williams, Thomas  
Center Contact: 281-483-8773 
thomas.j.will1@nasa.gov 
Unique ID: 10168 
Solicitation / Funding Source: 2013-14 HERO NNJ13ZSA002N-BMED Behavioral Health & Performance 
Grant/Contract No.: NNX15AC13G 
Project Type: GROUND 
Flight Program:  
TechPort: No 
No. of Post Docs:
No. of PhD Candidates:
No. of Master's Candidates:
No. of Bachelor's Candidates:
No. of PhD Degrees:
No. of Master's Degrees:
No. of Bachelor's Degrees:
Human Research Program Elements: (1) HFBP:Human Factors & Behavioral Performance (IRP Rev H)
Human Research Program Risks: (1) BMed:Risk of Adverse Cognitive or Behavioral Conditions and Psychiatric Disorders
Human Research Program Gaps: (1) BMed-101:We need to identify, quantify, and validate the key selection factors for astronaut cognitive and behavioral strengths (e.g., resiliency) and operationally-relevant performance threats for increasingly Earth independent, long-duration, autonomous, and/or long-distance exploration missions.
(2) BMed-102:Given exposures to spaceflight hazards (space radiation, isolation), how do we identify individual susceptibility, monitor molecular/biomarkers and acceptable thresholds, and validate behavioral health and CNS/neurological/neuropsychological performance measures and domains of relevance to exploration class missions?
(3) BMed-103:What are the validated, efficacious treatments (individual or Team-based) and/or countermeasures to prevent adverse behavioral conditions, CNS/neurological, and/or psychiatric disorders caused by either single and/or integrated exposures to spaceflight hazards during exploration class missions?
(4) BMed-108:Given each crewmember will experience multiple spaceflight hazards simultaneously, we need to identify and characterize the potential additive, antagonistic, or synergistic impacts of multiple stressors (e.g., space radiation, altered gravity, isolation, altered immune, altered sleep) on crew health and/or CNS/ cognitive functioning to develop threshold limits and validate countermeasures for any identified adverse crew health and/or operationally-relevant performance outcomes.
Flight Assignment/Project Notes: NOTE: Element change to Human Factors & Behavioral Performance; previously Behavioral Health & Performance (Ed., 1/17/17)

Task Description: Anecdotal and empirical findings collected in space and other extreme environments continue to highlight the potential for psychological symptoms and conditions to degrade crew performance, increase conflict, and jeopardize mission success. Indeed, ‘negative reactions’ during periods of isolation, confinement, demanding work schedules, stimulus reduction, separation from loved ones, sleep deprivation, and a host of other stressors are more appropriately viewed as normative rather than pathogenic. Selection methods and countermeasures serve to mitigate some degree of psychological risk, but long-duration space flight will substantially extend exposure to these and other stressors. Previous research documenting psychological symptoms experienced during space flight and in other isolated and confined environments (ICE) provides evidence of a wide range of psychological and behavioral reactions.

Unfortunately however, these collective data ultimately serve to raise more questions than answers. Differences in collection methods, types of symptoms/reactions assessed, psychological constructs examined, and timing and duration of measurements limit conclusions that can be drawn from this research. As a result, understanding of the discrete symptoms and conditions most likely to occur during space flight and thus, ability to quantify the magnitude, probability, or consequences of such risk remains inadequate. The current project proposes to address these notable gaps in knowledge via three specific Aims. First, we will conduct extensive scientific literature reviews and interviews with subject matter experts in order to synthesize existing knowledge of the psychological and behavioral symptoms experienced in space and other extreme environments (Aim 1). Our review will directly inform the development of a comprehensive checklist of symptoms to be monitored among 6 separate cohorts (i.e., 2 Antarctic and 4 Human Exploration Research Analog (HERA) cohorts) as part of a longitudinal investigation (Aim 2). Symptoms will be examined based on their point/period prevalence, severity, and duration. The checklist will also be administered (repeatedly) in conjunction with a physical symptoms checklist in order to examine concurrent and sequential overlap between psychological and physical health symptoms as means of clarifying potential etiologies. Finally, our study will extend previous research by exploring relationships among psychological health, sleep loss/dysregulation, biomarkers of stress, and performance-based outcomes (Aim 3). A comprehensive battery of cognitive and performance measures (including a perception-action coupling task) will be administered repeatedly as part of our longitudinal study. These outcomes will inform a final list of psychological/ behavioral symptoms to be examined during an extended International Space Station (ISS) mission.

Research Impact/Earth Benefits: Anecdotal and empirical findings collected in space and other extreme environments continue to highlight the potential for psychological symptoms and conditions to degrade crew performance, increase conflict, and jeopardize mission success. Indeed, ‘negative reactions’ during periods of isolation, confinement, demanding work schedules, stimulus reduction, separation from loved ones, sleep deprivation, and a host of other stressors are more appropriately viewed as normative rather than pathogenic. Selection methods and countermeasures serve to mitigate some degree of psychological risk, but long-duration space flight will substantially extend exposure to these and other stressors. Previous research documenting psychological symptoms experienced during space flight and in other isolated and confined environments (ICE) provides evidence of a wide range of psychological and behavioral reactions. Unfortunately however, these collective data ultimately serve to raise more questions than answers. Differences in collection methods, types of symptoms/reactions assessed, psychological constructs examined, and timing and duration of measurements limit conclusions that can be drawn from this research. As a result, understanding of the discrete symptoms and conditions most likely to occur during space flight and thus, ability to quantify the magnitude, probability, or consequences of such risk remains inadequate. Thus, there is a need to: (1) identify the psychological/behavioral symptoms that pose the greatest threat to performance; (2) provide accurate and acceptable risk thresholds; (3) inform screening and selection processes; (4) guide further development of suitable working practices (standard operating procedures); and (5) develop interventions and counter measures to mitigate these risks.

This project specifically addresses several knowledge gaps related to Risks of Adverse Behavioral Conditions and Psychiatric Disorders including; Gaps 1 (Need to identify and quantify the key threats to and promoters of mission relevant behavioral health and performance during exploration class missions) and Gap 3 (Need to identify and validate measures to monitor behavioral health and performance and determine acceptable thresholds for these measures during exploration missions). Our primary goal is to identify the psychological and behavioral health symptoms with the greatest likelihood of occurrence during extended human space flight/habitation to space and to estimate associated levels of threat imposed to mission-based performance. As a final deliverable, a checklist of symptoms will be developed for implementation during an ISS mission (>6 months) in order to determine its feasibility, reliability, and facilitation of evidence-based decision making with regard to crew health, safety, and mission success.

As a first step, we will conduct extensive scientific literature reviews and interviews with subject matter experts in order to synthesize existing knowledge of the psychological and behavioral symptoms experienced in space and other extreme environments (Aim 1). Our review will directly inform the development of a comprehensive checklist of symptoms to be monitored among 8 separate cohorts (i.e., 4 Antarctic and 4 HERA cohorts) as part of a longitudinal investigation (Aim 2). Symptoms will be examined based on their point/period prevalence, severity, and duration. The checklist will also be administered (repeatedly) in conjunction with the Space Medicine Exploration Medical Condition List (SMEMCL) in order to examine concurrent and sequential overlap between psychological and physical health symptoms as means of clarifying potential etiologies. Finally, our study will extend previous research by exploring relationships among psychological health, sleep loss/dysregulation, biomarkers of stress, and performance-based outcomes (Aim 3). A comprehensive battery of cognitive and performance measures (including a perception-action coupling task) will be administered repeatedly as part of our longitudinal study. These outcomes will inform a final list of psychological/ behavioral symptoms to be examined during an extended ISS mission.

Task Progress & Bibliography Information FY2017 
Task Progress: During year 2 of the project all objectives have been met. Specifically, we completed and submitted to NASA a comprehensive technical report titled, “Long-Duration Space Exploration and Emotional Health: Recommendations for Conceptualizing and Evaluating Risk.” The overarching goals of this report were to provide an integrative summary of emotion-based outcomes from previous studies in isolated, confined, extreme (ICE) environments and to provide specific recommendations for future research. We are currently awaiting feedback from Behavioral Health & Performance (BHP) element scientific staff regarding our report. During the next year of the project we will seek to publish our findings in a peer-reviewed journal.

At the time of this report, we have completed data collection in 3 of 4 HERA cohorts during the 2016 campaign. Few problems have been encountered and very few missing data have occurred. We are currently preparing for the 4th and final 2016 HERA mission and have begun cleaning data for analysis.

After receiving approval from the National Science Foundation (NSF) to implement our protocol in two Antarctic stations during the 2017 winterover season, we are currently working Neal Scheibe and the Antarctic Support Team at Lockheed Martin (contracted by NSF) to finalize logistics and implement our project in two Antarctic cohorts. We are in the process of purchasing and organizing all materials for the study which will be shipped to the two Antarctic stations in October 2016. We are also working with Dr. Jim McKeith, the Antarctic Support Contractor at Universit of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB), who will lead the research support team that will oversee our project on the ice.

Bibliography: Description: (Last Updated: 12/23/2022) 

Show Cumulative Bibliography
 
Abstracts for Journals and Proceedings Alfano CA, Simpson R, Connaboy C, Laughlin M, Zvolensky M, Deng Z. "Characterization of Psychological Risk, Overlap with Physical Health, and Associated Performance in Isolated, Confined, Extreme (ICE) Environments." Research poster at 2016 NASA Human Research Program Investigators’ Workshop, Galveston TX, Feb 8-11, 2016.

2016 NASA Human Research Program Investigators’ Workshop, Galveston TX, Feb 8-11, 2016. , Feb-2016

NASA Technical Documents Alfano CA, Bower J, Cowie J, Lau S, Simpson R. "Long-Duration Space Exploration and Emotional Health: Recommendations for Conceptualizing and Evaluating Emotional Risk." Technical Report submitted to NASA-Johnson Space Center, Houston, TX, May 2016. , May-2016
Project Title:  Characterization of Psychological Risk, Overlap with Physical Health, and Associated Performance in Isolated, Confined, Extreme (ICE) Environments Reduce
Images: icon  Fiscal Year: FY 2016 
Division: Human Research 
Research Discipline/Element:
HRP HFBP:Human Factors & Behavioral Performance (IRP Rev H)
Start Date: 11/13/2014  
End Date: 11/12/2017  
Task Last Updated: 09/01/2015 
Download report in PDF pdf
Principal Investigator/Affiliation:   Alfano, Candice  Ph.D. / University of Houston 
Address:  Psychology Department 
126 Heyne Bldg 
Houston , TX 77204-5022 
Email: caalfano@uh.edu 
Phone: 713-743-8611  
Congressional District: 18 
Web:  
Organization Type: UNIVERSITY 
Organization Name: University of Houston 
Joint Agency:  
Comments:  
Co-Investigator(s)
Affiliation: 
Connaboy, Christopher  Ph.D. University of Houston 
Laughlin, Mitzi  Ph.D. University of Houston 
Simpson, Richard  Ph.D. University of Houston 
Deng, Zhigang  Ph.D. University of Houston 
Zolensky, Michael  Ph.D. NASA Johnson Space Center 
Key Personnel Changes / Previous PI: None
Project Information: Grant/Contract No. NNX15AC13G 
Responsible Center: NASA JSC 
Grant Monitor: Leveton, Lauren  
Center Contact:  
lauren.b.leveton@nasa5.gov 
Unique ID: 10168 
Solicitation / Funding Source: 2013-14 HERO NNJ13ZSA002N-BMED Behavioral Health & Performance 
Grant/Contract No.: NNX15AC13G 
Project Type: GROUND 
Flight Program:  
TechPort: No 
No. of Post Docs:
No. of PhD Candidates:
No. of Master's Candidates:
No. of Bachelor's Candidates:
No. of PhD Degrees:
No. of Master's Degrees:
No. of Bachelor's Degrees:
Human Research Program Elements: (1) HFBP:Human Factors & Behavioral Performance (IRP Rev H)
Human Research Program Risks: (1) BMed:Risk of Adverse Cognitive or Behavioral Conditions and Psychiatric Disorders
Human Research Program Gaps: (1) BMed-101:We need to identify, quantify, and validate the key selection factors for astronaut cognitive and behavioral strengths (e.g., resiliency) and operationally-relevant performance threats for increasingly Earth independent, long-duration, autonomous, and/or long-distance exploration missions.
(2) BMed-102:Given exposures to spaceflight hazards (space radiation, isolation), how do we identify individual susceptibility, monitor molecular/biomarkers and acceptable thresholds, and validate behavioral health and CNS/neurological/neuropsychological performance measures and domains of relevance to exploration class missions?
(3) BMed-103:What are the validated, efficacious treatments (individual or Team-based) and/or countermeasures to prevent adverse behavioral conditions, CNS/neurological, and/or psychiatric disorders caused by either single and/or integrated exposures to spaceflight hazards during exploration class missions?
(4) BMed-108:Given each crewmember will experience multiple spaceflight hazards simultaneously, we need to identify and characterize the potential additive, antagonistic, or synergistic impacts of multiple stressors (e.g., space radiation, altered gravity, isolation, altered immune, altered sleep) on crew health and/or CNS/ cognitive functioning to develop threshold limits and validate countermeasures for any identified adverse crew health and/or operationally-relevant performance outcomes.
Task Description: Anecdotal and empirical findings collected in space and other extreme environments continue to highlight the potential for psychological symptoms and conditions to degrade crew performance, increase conflict, and jeopardize mission success. Indeed, ‘negative reactions’ during periods of isolation, confinement, demanding work schedules, stimulus reduction, separation from loved ones, sleep deprivation, and a host of other stressors are more appropriately viewed as normative rather than pathogenic. Selection methods and countermeasures serve to mitigate some degree of psychological risk, but long-duration space flight will substantially extend exposure to these and other stressors. Previous research documenting psychological symptoms experienced during space flight and in other isolated and confined environments (ICE) provides evidence of a wide range of psychological and behavioral reactions.

Unfortunately however, these collective data ultimately serve to raise more questions than answers. Differences in collection methods, types of symptoms/reactions assessed, psychological constructs examined, and timing and duration of measurements limit conclusions that can be drawn from this research. As a result, understanding of the discrete symptoms and conditions most likely to occur during space flight and thus, ability to quantify the magnitude, probability, or consequences of such risk remains inadequate. The current project proposes to address these notable gaps in knowledge via three specific Aims. First, we will conduct extensive scientific literature reviews and interviews with subject matter experts in order to synthesize existing knowledge of the psychological and behavioral symptoms experienced in space and other extreme environments (Aim 1). Our review will directly inform the development of a comprehensive checklist of symptoms to be monitored among 8 separate cohorts (i.e., 4 Antarctic and 4 Human Exploration Research Analog (HERA) cohorts) as part of a longitudinal investigation (Aim 2). Symptoms will be examined based on their point/period prevalence, severity, and duration. The checklist will also be administered (repeatedly) in conjunction with the Space Medicine Exploration Medical Condition List (SMEMCL) in order to examine concurrent and sequential overlap between psychological and physical health symptoms as means of clarifying potential etiologies. Finally, our study will extend previous research by exploring relationships among psychological health, sleep loss/dysregulation, biomarkers of stress, and performance-based outcomes (Aim 3). A comprehensive battery of cognitive and performance measures (including a perception-action coupling task) will be administered repeatedly as part of our longitudinal study. These outcomes will inform a final list of psychological/ behavioral symptoms to be examined during an extended International Space Station (ISS) mission.

Research Impact/Earth Benefits: Anecdotal and empirical findings collected in space and other extreme environments continue to highlight the potential for psychological symptoms and conditions to degrade crew performance, increase conflict, and jeopardize mission success. Indeed, ‘negative reactions’ during periods of isolation, confinement, demanding work schedules, stimulus reduction, separation from loved ones, sleep deprivation, and a host of other stressors are more appropriately viewed as normative rather than pathogenic. Selection methods and countermeasures serve to mitigate some degree of psychological risk, but long-duration space flight will substantially extend exposure to these and other stressors. Previous research documenting psychological symptoms experienced during space flight and in other isolated and confined environments (ICE) provides evidence of a wide range of psychological and behavioral reactions. Unfortunately however, these collective data ultimately serve to raise more questions than answers. Differences in collection methods, types of symptoms/reactions assessed, psychological constructs examined, and timing and duration of measurements limit conclusions that can be drawn from this research. As a result, understanding of the discrete symptoms and conditions most likely to occur during space flight and thus, ability to quantify the magnitude, probability, or consequences of such risk remains inadequate. Thus, there is a need to: (1) identify the psychological/behavioral symptoms that pose the greatest threat to performance; (2) provide accurate and acceptable risk thresholds; (3) inform screening and selection processes; (4) guide further development of suitable working practices (standard operating procedures); and (5) develop interventions and counter measures to mitigate these risks.

This project specifically addresses several knowledge gaps related to Risks of Adverse Behavioral Conditions and Psychiatric Disorders including; Gaps 1 (Need to identify and quantify the key threats to and promoters of mission relevant behavioral health and performance during exploration class missions) and Gap 3 (Need to identify and validate measures to monitor behavioral health and performance and determine acceptable thresholds for these measures during exploration missions). Our primary goal is to identify the psychological and behavioral health symptoms with the greatest likelihood of occurrence during extended human space flight/habitation to space and to estimate associated levels of threat imposed to mission-based performance. As a final deliverable, a checklist of symptoms will be developed for implementation during an ISS mission (>6 months) in order to determine its feasibility, reliability, and facilitation of evidence-based decision making with regard to crew health, safety, and mission success.

As a first step, we will conduct extensive scientific literature reviews and interviews with subject matter experts in order to synthesize existing knowledge of the psychological and behavioral symptoms experienced in space and other extreme environments (Aim 1). Our review will directly inform the development of a comprehensive checklist of symptoms to be monitored among 8 separate cohorts (i.e., 4 Antarctic and 4 HERA cohorts) as part of a longitudinal investigation (Aim 2). Symptoms will be examined based on their point/period prevalence, severity, and duration. The checklist will also be administered (repeatedly) in conjunction with the Space Medicine Exploration Medical Condition List (SMEMCL) in order to examine concurrent and sequential overlap between psychological and physical health symptoms as means of clarifying potential etiologies. Finally, our study will extend previous research by exploring relationships among psychological health, sleep loss/dysregulation, biomarkers of stress, and performance-based outcomes (Aim 3). A comprehensive battery of cognitive and performance measures (including a perception-action coupling task) will be administered repeatedly as part of our longitudinal study. These outcomes will inform a final list of psychological/ behavioral symptoms to be examined during an extended ISS mission.

Task Progress & Bibliography Information FY2016 
Task Progress: Project objectives for Year 1 include: 1) obtaining Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval for the protocol from the University of Houston (UH) and NASA; 2) hiring a project coordinator; 3) conducting a comprehensive literature review of the effects of ICE environments on psychological/behavioral heath; 4) completing a review paper summarizing findings from the literature review; 5) conducting SME interviews; 6) obtaining all self-report measures and licenses; and 7) modifying perception-action coupling software for the HERA environment. Each of these goals has been met or is underway as described below.

IRB approval from UH was obtained in February 2015 and from NASA in May 2015. A project coordinator was hired for the project and will begin work at UH in October 2015. The literature review is well underway and a final review paper is expected to be submitted to NASA in December 2015. The PI has completed 9 out of 10 total SME interviews, including interviews with: a NASA psychologist, a NASA psychiatrist, two NASA flight surgeons, a NASA astronaut, a psychologist involved in selection for work ICE environments, a crewmember of the 520-day Mars500 study, a scientist from NASA’s Explorations Medical Capability Unit, and a medical doctor with Antarctic winterover experience. The perception action coupling software and equipment are currently being modified to suit the HERA environment. We have also submitted the Science Requirements Document for our protocol to NASA Flight Analogue Projects (FAP) for the 2016 HERA campaign and have begun to assemble the final version of our Neurobehavioral Checklist for use in all HERA cohorts.

Bibliography: Description: (Last Updated: 12/23/2022) 

Show Cumulative Bibliography
 
 None in FY 2016
Project Title:  Characterization of Psychological Risk, Overlap with Physical Health, and Associated Performance in Isolated, Confined, Extreme (ICE) Environments Reduce
Images: icon  Fiscal Year: FY 2015 
Division: Human Research 
Research Discipline/Element:
HRP HFBP:Human Factors & Behavioral Performance (IRP Rev H)
Start Date: 11/13/2014  
End Date: 11/12/2017  
Task Last Updated: 03/30/2015 
Download report in PDF pdf
Principal Investigator/Affiliation:   Alfano, Candice  Ph.D. / University of Houston 
Address:  Psychology Department 
126 Heyne Bldg 
Houston , TX 77204-5022 
Email: caalfano@uh.edu 
Phone: 713-743-8611  
Congressional District: 18 
Web:  
Organization Type: UNIVERSITY 
Organization Name: University of Houston 
Joint Agency:  
Comments:  
Co-Investigator(s)
Affiliation: 
Connaboy, Christopher  Ph.D. University of Houston 
Laughlin, Mitzi  Ph.D. University of Houston 
Simpson, Richard  Ph.D. University of Houston 
Deng, Zhigang  Ph.D. University of Houston 
Zolensky, Michael  Ph.D. NASA Johnson Space Center 
Project Information: Grant/Contract No. NNX15AC13G 
Responsible Center: NASA JSC 
Grant Monitor: Leveton, Lauren  
Center Contact:  
lauren.b.leveton@nasa5.gov 
Unique ID: 10168 
Solicitation / Funding Source: 2013-14 HERO NNJ13ZSA002N-BMED Behavioral Health & Performance 
Grant/Contract No.: NNX15AC13G 
Project Type: GROUND 
Flight Program:  
TechPort: No 
No. of Post Docs:  
No. of PhD Candidates:  
No. of Master's Candidates:  
No. of Bachelor's Candidates:  
No. of PhD Degrees:  
No. of Master's Degrees:  
No. of Bachelor's Degrees:  
Human Research Program Elements: (1) HFBP:Human Factors & Behavioral Performance (IRP Rev H)
Human Research Program Risks: (1) BMed:Risk of Adverse Cognitive or Behavioral Conditions and Psychiatric Disorders
Human Research Program Gaps: (1) BMed-101:We need to identify, quantify, and validate the key selection factors for astronaut cognitive and behavioral strengths (e.g., resiliency) and operationally-relevant performance threats for increasingly Earth independent, long-duration, autonomous, and/or long-distance exploration missions.
(2) BMed-102:Given exposures to spaceflight hazards (space radiation, isolation), how do we identify individual susceptibility, monitor molecular/biomarkers and acceptable thresholds, and validate behavioral health and CNS/neurological/neuropsychological performance measures and domains of relevance to exploration class missions?
(3) BMed-103:What are the validated, efficacious treatments (individual or Team-based) and/or countermeasures to prevent adverse behavioral conditions, CNS/neurological, and/or psychiatric disorders caused by either single and/or integrated exposures to spaceflight hazards during exploration class missions?
(4) BMed-108:Given each crewmember will experience multiple spaceflight hazards simultaneously, we need to identify and characterize the potential additive, antagonistic, or synergistic impacts of multiple stressors (e.g., space radiation, altered gravity, isolation, altered immune, altered sleep) on crew health and/or CNS/ cognitive functioning to develop threshold limits and validate countermeasures for any identified adverse crew health and/or operationally-relevant performance outcomes.
Task Description: Anecdotal and empirical findings collected in space and other extreme environments continue to highlight the potential for psychological symptoms and conditions to degrade crew performance, increase conflict, and jeopardize mission success. Indeed, ‘negative reactions’ during periods of isolation, confinement, demanding work schedules, stimulus reduction, separation from loved ones, sleep deprivation, and a host of other stressors are more appropriately viewed as normative rather than pathogenic. Selection methods and countermeasures serve to mitigate some degree of psychological risk, but long-duration space flight will substantially extend exposure to these and other stressors. Previous research documenting psychological symptoms experienced during space flight and in other isolated and confined environments (ICE) provides evidence of a wide range of psychological and behavioral reactions. Unfortunately however, these collective data ultimately serve to raise more questions than answers. Differences in collection methods, types of symptoms/reactions assessed, psychological constructs examined, and timing and duration of measurements limit conclusions that can be drawn from this research. As a result, understanding of the discrete symptoms and conditions most likely to occur during space flight and thus, ability to quantify the magnitude, probability, or consequences of such risk remains inadequate. The current project proposes to address these notable gaps in knowledge via three specific Aims. First, we will conduct extensive scientific literature reviews and interviews with subject matter experts in order to synthesize existing knowledge of the psychological and behavioral symptoms experienced in space and other extreme environments (Aim 1). Our review will directly inform the development of a comprehensive checklist of symptoms to be monitored among 8 separate cohorts (i.e., 4 Antarctic and 4 HERA cohorts) as part of a longitudinal investigation (Aim 2). Symptoms will be examined based on their point/period prevalence, severity, and duration. The checklist will also be administered (repeatedly) in conjunction with the Space Medicine Exploration Medical Condition List (SMEMCL) in order to examine concurrent and sequential overlap between psychological and physical health symptoms as means of clarifying potential etiologies. Finally, our study will extend previous research by exploring relationships among psychological health, sleep loss/dysregulation, biomarkers of stress, and performance-based outcomes (Aim 3). A comprehensive battery of cognitive and performance measures (including a perception-action coupling task) will be administered repeatedly as part of our longitudinal study. These outcomes will inform a final list of psychological/ behavioral symptoms to be examined during an extended International Space Station (ISS) mission.

Research Impact/Earth Benefits:

Task Progress & Bibliography Information FY2015 
Task Progress: New project for FY2015.

Bibliography: Description: (Last Updated: 12/23/2022) 

Show Cumulative Bibliography
 
 None in FY 2015