ED. NOTE (5.17.2019): Compiled from PI's final progress report submitted to NASA Human Research Program in early 2019.
Poorly designed habitats and vehicles reduce crew safety, introduce inefficiencies and errors, and reduce satisfaction. It is therefore important to study and characterize habitability and human factors on board the International Space Station (ISS) to improve future vehicle and habitat design.
Research was performed under the directed research project titled Habitability Assessment of International Space Station (ISS Habitability) Human Factors and Behavioral Performance (HFBP). The aim of the study was to address the Risk of an Incompatible Vehicle/Habitat Design, and researchers collected and analyzed data about human factors and habitability on board the ISS and made recommendations for redesign of future vehicles. The participants of the study used two custom iPad applications: they recorded observations about their living and working environment using the Space Habitability Observation Reporting Tool (iSHORT), and they responded to questionnaires on the iQuestion and Answer (iQ&A) application. Six ISS crewmembers participated in the study; one crewmember spent a year on the ISS and the other five crewmembers spent six months on board.
Participants collected data throughout their missions: they were asked to capture observations about their environment about once every two weeks; to capture a video as they passed through an area of ISS about once per month; to narrate a task about once per month; to complete a human factors and habitability questionnaire three times during the mission; and to participate in a conference with the investigator’s team after they had filled out each questionnaire. Content analysis was used to categorize the data, draw general conclusions, and make recommendations for future vehicle and habitat designs.
This study revolved around two primary aims. The first aim, to characterize human factors and habitability aboard ISS, was fully achieved by the study. Details about habitability and human factors during a long duration microgravity exposure were documented, and the relationship between environmental factors and performance were analyzed and used to derive recommendations for future missions and vehicle design (Aim 1a). The effect of mission length on human factors reporting by crewmember were examined by looking at mission breakdown by phase, and did not appear to have a consistent pattern (Aim 1b). However, it is important to note that only 1 of the 6 crewmembers who participated in the study was a 1-year mission crewmember. In future studies, the potential effect of variable mission length should be examined with additional participants. Aim 1c, examine the cost versus benefit of implementing the use of near-real time tools for collecting feedback, was addressed by the feasibility and success of implementing the data collection tools.
The second aim, to characterize the utilization of space on ISS, was partially addressed by examining specific locations about which participants submitted observations. A future study focusing on achieving aim 2 should include the development/refinement of existing tools in order to fully address these important questions.
In general, the study participants provided thoroughly detailed and insightful feedback for all data collection types. The participants had a good understanding of the types of details that will be of interest to habitability and human factors experts, and have provided a wealth of information relevant for the design of future space vehicles and habitats. Providing an opportunity for participants to capture observations while on-orbit allowed them to give demonstrations and discuss details that are fresh on their mind. Ideally, this type of near real-time reporting of human factors and habitability concerns should continue as part of regular operations on ISS and in future programs, potentially as an integrated part of the Crew Notes functionality. This data will be of outstanding value not only to human factors researchers and vehicle designers, but to the greater operational community as well.
|